1. The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected and the knowledge learned is comprehensively used to solve the problem. The secretary obtained is reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. The format of foreign language papers is correct, standardized, clear and fluent.

2. The literature research in this paper is comprehensive and systematic, the guiding ideology of topic selection is clear, the experimental design is reasonable and feasible, and it can be carried out according to the experimental plan and achieve the expected results.

3. The topic of the paper is appropriate, with certain independent opinions, sufficient argumentation, extensive information but insufficient theoretical and practical support. English is basically fluent, except for some grammatical errors, the format of the paper meets the requirements of the specification.

4. This paper has a novel topic and a unique perspective, which embodies a solid theoretical foundation of human resource management. In particular, the article can demonstrate and analyze the topic in combination with relevant cases, which has certain practical value.

5. The topic of the paper is appropriate, and the viewpoint is correct, but it lacks original opinions, and the argumentation content is sufficient, but it lacks argumentation depth. English expression is fluent, but there are a few grammatical errors, and the format of the paper meets the requirements of the specification.

Paper evaluation criteria:

First, excellent:

1, good learning attitude, serious writing, the paper fully meets the requirements of the specification, and the submitted materials are complete.

2. I can read the designated reading reference materials and documents on time, and I can also read more self-selected materials and documents, and carefully write the relevant literature experience and summary.

3. The thesis is rigorous in structure, logical, clear in level, fluent in sentences, accurate in language and clear in expression.

4. The paper has original opinions in some aspects, has innovative or profound analysis on some issues, and has a high academic level.

5, the argument is clear and correct, the argument is conclusive and sufficient, the argument has strong ability to analyze and summarize practical problems, and the article is persuasive.

The second level:

1, learning attitude is not very serious, the paper barely meets the specification requirements, and the submitted materials are incomplete.

2. Read the designated reference materials and documents, and make reading notes and literature review.

3. The structure of the paper is loose, the logic is not strong, the discussion is basically clear, but the persuasiveness is not strong, and the arts and sciences are not smooth.

4. The topic has some value, but the paper has no original ideas.

5. The viewpoint is basically correct, the arguments are atypical and not detailed, the analysis and discussion are not profound and the persuasion is not strong.

6. When you reply, your thoughts are still very clear and you can clarify your basic views. Although I can't answer some important questions completely correctly, I can make corrections or supplements after being inspired.