Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Monopoly influence of academic papers
Monopoly influence of academic papers
As a platform for gathering academic resources, video network should provide convenience for all those who like academic research, but the phenomenon of knowledge monopoly emerges endlessly. To solve the problem reasonably, the following measures need to be taken:

Relevant government departments should establish a new academic platform to break this situation. In China, there are basically no other formal and large-scale academic platforms except HowNet and Wanfang Platform. In this way, HowNet has collected all academic resources on its own platform. For a long time, without competition, there will be monopoly or even non-standardization of fees. Therefore, to solve this phenomenon, the most important thing is to let HowNet have competitors. Only by staying with competitors can we solve the monopoly problem to the maximum extent, and competition will also make HowNet's own platform management more perfect and more in line with consumers' expectations.

Schools should not take HowNet as the standard of academic papers and adopt diversification. Many schools are judging whether students' papers are qualified or not. The most important factor is whether the paper is approved and uploaded to HowNet. If it is not uploaded to HowNet, they will subconsciously think that the academic level of the paper is not high. In this regard, teachers must change their previous logical thinking and truly judge whether students' academic level is high. They should not take HowNet as the standard, but comprehensively judge a student's academic level through their own academic level. As long as the academic level is high, even if it is not uploaded to HowNet, students' academic achievements and other excellent aspects cannot be denied, thus putting an end to the phenomenon of knowledge monopoly.

The last way is related laws and regulations. We must strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights and resolutely put an end to the monopoly of intellectual property rights. This level mainly solves the problem that academic resources are academic resources, and it is understandable to charge fees, but it is obviously unreasonable to make profits for yourself through the intellectual property rights of others. To take a step back, HowNet platform can charge corresponding management fees or service fees, but it cannot be a tool for collecting money.