If you are a master's liberal arts student, because there are too many theoretical knowledge of liberal arts papers, and most of the theories are included in the database of the duplicate checking system, the duplicate checking standard of master's liberal arts will be higher than that of science, generally taking 25% as the dividing line. Therefore, in this case, the repetition rate is lower than 10% or better.
Excluding the above two situations, if you are an undergraduate, as we all know, due to the lack of scientific research experience, most of the papers are pieced together, with many manuscripts extracted and many references cited. Therefore, the standard for undergraduate students is relatively broad, generally around 30%. So in view of this summary, the repetition rate below 10% is still excellent.
The above assumption is based on what you said that the repetition rate is the result of duplicate checking through HowNet, because there are many duplicate checking systems in the market, and most universities in China also use HowNet as a testing system.
First of all, we should understand the principle of paper duplicate checking. The basic principle of paper duplication checking is the process of uploading papers to the duplication checking system and comparing them with the system database. Combined with some detection algorithm, a similarity rate is obtained, that is, the paper duplicate checking rate!
In addition, the duplicate checking system is not so intelligent that it can't express meaning through comparison. His algorithm only judges plagiarism according to the similarity of words. What it needs to do is to try to change it and make it different from others. It doesn't matter if you agree. There must be a difference between description and expression.