2. The language expression is general, and the format fully meets the specification requirements; Referring to some documents, its timeliness is general; No obvious plagiarism was found.
3. The topic of the paper meets the professional training objectives, and can basically achieve the comprehensive training objectives, with less difficulty and less workload. The theme of the paper is general.
4. The student's ability to consult documents is poor, and he can't collect information about the examination system comprehensively. In the process of writing, he has poor ability to comprehensively apply the knowledge of examination system and analyze the problems of examination system. The length of the article meets the requirements of the college, the content is not complete enough, the hierarchical structure is problematic, the main points are not prominent enough, the logic is poor, and there is no personal opinion. The title of the article is biased, the argument is not prominent enough, and the discussion can't stick to the theme.
5. The language expression is poor and the format meets the specification requirements; Less possession data and poor timeliness; Some contents are similar to others' achievements.
6. During the three-month graduation project, students can successfully complete the whole graduation project and thesis writing under the strict requirements of teachers. The program can run correctly, the interface is arranged reasonably and the paper meets the requirements.
7. In the whole graduation design process, I have a correct attitude, study hard and arrange my time reasonably. I can get to the lab on time, and there is no reason to leave early or be late. Can basically complete the corresponding tasks at each stage, but also take the initiative to work overtime, so that time is tight before it is loose. Of course, there are also some shortcomings and areas that need improvement.