First, the provisions of master's thesis literature review

1. In order to make the report of the selected topic have sufficient basis, graduate students are required to make a literature review before opening the topic.

2. In the literature review, graduate students should systematically consult the domestic and foreign literature related to their own research direction. Read at least 30 articles at ordinary times, and collect documents objectively and comprehensively.

3. In the literature review, graduate students should explain the development history of their research direction, the main research achievements of predecessors, existing problems and development trends.

4. Literature review should be clear and concise.

5. Use data appropriately and reasonably. References are quoted in square brackets [? ] is enclosed in the upper right corner of the citation.

6, literature review should have their own views and opinions. You can't confuse the author's views with the literature. Encourage graduate students to find more problems, ask more questions, and point out possible ways to analyze and solve problems, which is highly targeted.

Second, the writing requirements of literature review

1, cut to the chase, don't beat around the bush. Avoid long-winded narration of historical origin and research process.

2, concise, highlight the key points. We shouldn't talk too much about the common sense content familiar to our peers and in textbooks. When it is really necessary to mention other people's research results and basic principles, we only need to mark them in the form of quotations. In the introduction, when putting forward the work and opinions of this paper, we should make the meaning clear and the language concise.

3. Reviewing the history should be focused, and the content should closely follow the title of the article, introduce the background around the title and summarize it in a few words; Don't write out the methods and results and don't discuss them when prompting the methods used; Although the contents of past documents can be quoted appropriately, they should not be listed in detail, and the preface should not be written as the historical development of research.

Don't write the preface as a small summary of the literature, let alone repeat the common sense content already in the textbook or known by researchers in this field.

4. Respect science and seek truth from facts. In the preface, we should properly evaluate the value of the paper, seek truth from facts and use scientific words. For the innovation of this paper, it is best not to use inappropriate self-evaluation such as "This study is the first report in China", "Filling the domestic blank", "High academic value", "This study has not been reported in China" and "This study is at the leading level at home and abroad".