My personal experience in thesis and thesis defense, I don't know if I can give you some reference.

My personal experience, objectively speaking, the thesis defense is the same as the multiple-choice and true-false questions in the exam, which actually gives the candidates a rare opportunity to give points for nothing.

Generally speaking, the thesis should put forward a related proposition according to your major, that is, the argument in your thesis, and then you need to use some evidence to prove that your argument is correct, that is, the argument in your thesis.

In order to make your argument get favorable and powerful support, you can support it with more relevant arguments, generally three or four arguments are appropriate, and at the same time, you must pay attention to the reliability of the arguments. The arguments in the paper must be scientifically proved to be correct, so that the teachers in the exam can have no loopholes to exploit.

In fact, the thesis is a process of expanding and fully expounding the arguments put forward in your thesis with your arguments. This process of explanation is a process of proving the correctness of your argument with arguments.

In order to successfully pass the defense, first of all, the paper should be written by itself, and the meaning of the arguments in the paper should be very clear, and the meaning of the arguments supporting the arguments should be very clear.

Thesis defense is actually a second extended explanation to the examination teacher on the basis of writing the arguments in your thesis. Most importantly, if you can grasp the connotation of the arguments and arguments in your paper and explain them, and grasp the key words in your paper, that is, the words listed by yourself under the title of your paper, you can explain them. It should be said that there is no problem in passing the paper. Because the paper was written by myself, there is nothing rote in it.

If what you say is true, "the defense teachers in the thesis defense part don't play cards according to the routine", it can be said that these defense teachers didn't give questions according to the examination requirements of thesis defense, and they are absolutely not allowed to do so; It can also be said that they are fooling around; They don't understand the requirements of thesis defense examination at all; Or they may try to achieve other goals. They have no right to do so. If they do, it's not a question of whether your paper is good or not. If I take part in this kind of thesis defense, in order to avoid this from happening to me, I will take a voice recorder with me when I take part in the thesis defense and record the whole process of my thesis defense.

If you really meet this kind of teacher who "the defense teacher doesn't follow the routine", your thesis defense fails, and there is no other way. Take the recording as your evidence and take your paper to the Provincial Labor and Social Security Bureau to sue them. In the end, you must win, they must be humiliated, and they are also ruined. And in the end, they will pass your thesis defense. All candidates who take part in thesis defense in the future should thank you.

Good luck with your thesis defense!

Tianzhixing

2007.2.4

club.qingdaonews.com/showAnnounce.php? Boya ... 44K

There are some cases over the years on the Internet. Please have a look. I wish you success!