The topic of going to the countryside by car has become a hot topic recently. I saw some comments in the jar, saying that there are too many problems with cars going to the countryside, the use environment is poor, the maintenance is inconvenient, the driver's license is difficult to test, it is unfair to only subsidize small trucks, the cost of using cars is high, and farmers' consumption concept is backward. I want to say that this is to apply the immature concept of automobile consumption in China city to the countryside. This is ridiculous. The reason for this ridiculous remark is that in some people's minds, the impression of the countryside still stays 30 years ago. For example, some people think that farmers prefer agricultural tricycles or tractors instead of buying pure consumer goods such as cars. In fact, as long as you go to the countryside to have a look, you will know that in rural areas, especially in some economically developed rural areas, only a few people own cars, and some people have already bought cars as long as their economic ability allows. Because farmers buy cars, not just by car. For many farmers, cars are also a means of production, and their transportation efficiency is far greater than that of agricultural tricycles or tractors. They can also walk instead of walking, and one car is multi-purpose, which is naturally popular. This is an indisputable fact. For another example, some people say that the concept of car use is an invisible force that hinders rural car consumption. They think that rural families who don't walk into big cities all day have no concept of using cars at all. As we all know, not entering the city does not mean that there is no travel demand. Traffic is also needed between villages, between townships and between townships and counties. Farmers, like urban residents, have the concept of using cars, and once their economic ability reaches the point of consuming cars, they will put them into action. On this issue, there is no essential difference between urban residents and rural farmers. Others question the problem of rural roads, taking it for granted that rural roads are narrow and rugged, and once there is rain and snow, the roads will be more muddy and difficult to walk. In fact, it's really rare that there is no car in China. I have been in go on road trip for 20 years. There are many such places, but not many. Even in mountainous provinces such as Tibet, Yunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan, there are few such villages. On the contrary, most rural roads are easier than my way home every day. By the way, I live in Tiantongyuan, Beijing. Some people are worried about farmers' friends from the use cost, saying that a car with 65,438+10,000 yuan needs 1000 yuan every month to maintain the car. For rural families, the high cost of car maintenance will be the biggest obstacle to the promotion of cars in rural areas. Your algorithm can be used in cities, but it is not suitable for rural areas. People in rural areas don't have to pay parking fees, do they? Insurance is enough. It's enough to buy a compulsory compulsory compulsory insurance from the state. You can wash your car yourself. What else is there? Travel expenses, 400 yuan throughout the year. The rest is mainly gas money, and how much gas money you have to pay for how many roads you take, not to mention that a considerable part of cars are used for rural production, and the use itself is creating wealth. As long as the output value increased by using cars to improve efficiency is greater than the input of fixed assets, cars will have a broad demand space in rural areas. Someone said the toll? There is no toll between villages. Even if there are toll stations of national and provincial roads between the two villages or between the village and the county seat, people are also native villagers and are very familiar with the ground. Go around the village. When I was in go on road trip, when I met the toll stations of national and provincial roads, I often bypassed the nearby villages, not to mention the local people. Others questioned why only minivans and vans are encouraged, while passenger cars are excluded. Comparing the automobile consumption views of Europe, America and Japan, we can find that China's automobile consumption view is not only ridiculous, but also naive. Cars can only be used for riding, and there is no other use. You are so rich economically that you spend 6.5438+200,000 yuan on a car that can only carry people? Minivans popular in Europe, pickup trucks popular in North America, and small-displacement cars generally accepted by the Japanese, but even people who can't afford cars here should scoff. Obviously, the economy has not reached the level of others, but it is blindly pursuing face-saving projects in automobile consumption, afraid of falling and not looking good on face. Is this consumption mentality ridiculous? As I was writing this passage, I drove to the home improvement market to buy a floor and bargain with the store. Later, the store was forced by me, so I had to say: if you can transport all the goods with your own car now, the price will go as you say. What the store never expected was that more than 50 boxes of composite wood floors were easily put into my van (my own car is a family MPV car), and the space was bigger. The shopkeeper was curious and said that the car didn't look big. Why does it have such a big belly? I will buy another car like this in time. It turns out that the owner of the shop is driving a sedan, and he can't fit several boxes of wooden floors. Rural users have a greater demand for multifunctional cars than urban users, so vans can not only ride, but also transport goods. Multipurpose vehicles are the best choice. Encouraging farmers' friends with economic ability to consume automobiles is essentially to popularize industrial civilization and let more farmers accept automobiles, which can not only improve production efficiency, create more wealth through automobiles, realize a virtuous circle of the economy, but also expand the life radius of farmers' friends, broaden their horizons and increase their knowledge, which is conducive to improving the overall quality of the people. At the same time, let more people establish modern traffic awareness, understand what traffic is and what traffic regulations are, and try to avoid traffic tragedies caused by migrant workers' ignorance of traffic regulations. At present, the country is carrying out temporary preferential policies, which is not enough. Considering the above advantages, from the perspective of promoting the development of China's automobile industry, farmers should be exempted from purchase tax when buying minivans and vans, and local policies are not allowed, and hitchhiking fees are not allowed in various regions. Although the car goes to the countryside, it is good news for van manufacturers such as Changhe, Great Wall, Wuling and Hafei. However, it is wrong for manufacturers to simply regard the countryside as the lifeline in the economic crisis. To open up the rural market, we must use the same attitude as to open up the urban market to ensure the quality of every ex-factory car. This is the truly safe road to development. If the car sold goes back to her parents' house for repair once every three days, even if it is free, it will also hurt the enthusiasm of farmers' friends to buy it. At that time, it is the manufacturer who needs to bear more consequences.