It should play a certain role, but I personally think that if a person wants to cheat, even if you stop him, he will cheat. If a person doesn't want to cheat, even if you do nothing, he will write a paper carefully. I don't think we should study how to prevent fraud in methods, but improve education. We should study the quality of teaching and the methods of educating students, so that students can realize what learning is for. Let him feel that fraud is shameful, and only in this way can academic fraud be eradicated. In addition, to identify academic fraud, I think we should start from the following angles:

1. Observe the data of the paper.

In fact, this is the easiest way to tell whether a paper is true or false, because a paper that you have studied yourself is considered by yourself. Imagine how a researcher can have so many valid data without experiments, observations and investigations. It is impossible to fabricate a paper just by fabrication. Even if it is fabricated, it is very easy for people to see that it is false. Therefore, observing data is an important means to effectively measure the authenticity of a paper, but it needs very careful observation.

2. Look at the writing of the paper

The second point may be more difficult and needs some capable teachers to distinguish it. It depends on the writing of students' papers. To be exact, it depends on whether the opinions and data discussed in the article are copied from others. This also requires a well-informed teacher, or really spend some time to check all kinds of papers and compare them.

3. Real personal experience

1 finally, after studying and investigating all the papers, we should compare his real personal experience, that is to say, we have read his papers, his writing methods and investigated his data, and then combine these things into one and compare his personal experience to see if they are consistent. If it is consistent, then this paper is basically not fake.