The main problem that the paper failed to pass the external review focused on the quality and content of the article. The common reasons are that the innovation of the paper is not enough, the content-related analysis is superficial, which can not arouse the interest of experts, the article is not fully demonstrated and the persuasion is limited. The above are the common reasons why foreign reviews are rejected, so we must pay attention to them when writing.
Notice of the Ministry of Education on Printing and Distributing the Sampling Method for Undergraduate Graduation Thesis (Design) (for Trial Implementation)
Tenth provincial education administrative departments shall organize peer experts to review the randomly matched sampling papers and put forward opinions. Each paper is sent to 3 peer experts, and graduation papers with more than 2 (including 2) experts' comments as "unqualified" are regarded as "problematic graduation papers".
Of the three experts, 1 expert's evaluation is "unqualified", and two experts from the same industry will be sent for re-evaluation. More than 1 experts (including 1 experts) among the two re-evaluation experts are judged as "unqualified" and will be regarded as "problematic graduation thesis".
Reference to the above contents: Notice of People's Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Education-Ministry of Education on Printing and Distributing the Sampling Method for Undergraduate Graduation Thesis (Design) (for Trial Implementation)