The main content of the paper (1) is to describe the application of a set of methods in specific situations.

(2) This method must be innovative or breakthrough, and therefore contribute to the academic community.

Therefore, it is either a new method to solve the existing problems, or a new application of the existing methods, or a new method to open a new application field.

(3) In the paper, you must be able to present enough evidence to convince readers that your method is indeed superior to all the existing methods in the literature for this application.

(4) In addition, you must be able to clearly point out the limitations of this method in application, and provide enough evidence to convince readers that your method is applicable in any application as long as you can meet your assumptions (preconditions), and the advantages you described will certainly exist.

(5) You must also clearly point out the limitations and possible shortcomings of this method in your paper (compared with the existing methods in other documents or other applications).

(6) Stylistically, it is a professional exposition with rigorous argumentation, clear logical relationship and rigorous structure.

That is to say, in the process of describing your method, you must clearly explain the application program of this method and the process of all simulation or experimental results, so that any reader in this professional field can copy your research results in his laboratory according to your description, thus ensuring that your conclusions can indeed be repeated "at any time, at any place and by anyone" (repeatability is the fundamental requirement of "science").

(7) Moreover, you must provide sufficient reasons for each step of this method and explain "why it must be so".

(8) Finally, your paper must clearly indicate all the documents related to your research topic in an appropriate position.

Moreover, you must remember that it is necessary for you to find out all the academic literature (especially academic journal papers) related to the problem you are studying (if you miss it, it's your fault) and read it carefully.

If, during the oral examination of your paper, a member of the oral examination committee points out that an existing document is better than your method in dealing with the problem you are discussing, it constitutes a sufficient reason for your paper to fail.