At the beginning, domestic wps occupied most of the market (the form software was CCED in the same period), and there was almost no major version evolution. Later word entered the domestic market (pirated mode). Because of its intuitive WYSIWYG graphic typesetting method, domestic users threw their flags into the arms of word in a short time, gradually laying a solid foundation for office in the domestic market. Later, although the graphic version of wps caught up, it was helpless under the default attitude that pirated software was rampant and Microsoft didn't understand. In all fairness, wps and office have their own advantages in practical use, but affected by fixed thinking patterns and operating habits, people are unwilling to spend more money to study again, so there is something wrong with the landlord. If wps had adjusted the software development to the direction of graphical interface operation in time, office would not have occupied the leading position in domestic text typesetting, and there would not be a question of whether wps and word were completely compatible, but whether word was compatible with wps.

Don't spray if you don't like the above feeling.