1, basic structure of the paper: you can comment on whether the paper meets the basic structure requirements, whether the framework is complete, whether the font is uniform, whether there are typos, whether the format is standardized and whether the level is clear.
2. Material selection: whether the author's material selection is contemporary and realistic, whether the viewpoint expression is accurate, whether the full text is accurate, and whether the reference materials are combined with the theme.
3. The reality and operability of the research content: whether to select social hot issues, whether the logic is rigorous, whether the viewpoint expression is comprehensive, whether to combine the principle of professional knowledge with practical problems in the demonstration process, and whether the arguments are sufficient.
4. The topic meets the professional requirements: the topic is whether it is close to your major, whether the case argument is sufficient, whether a good solution is given to the problems raised, and whether the reference materials are related to this major.
Extended data:
The shortcomings of the paper can also be commented from the following aspects:
1, research topic: whether it fully reflects the characteristics of the times and whether it can be used as a reference for social related research. Whether we can adjust the basic concepts and ask questions in the full-text structure is a problem that needs in-depth analysis;
2. Whether the idea of the paper is novel: whether the theme and reasons are comprehensively analyzed in combination with local norms, whether the content is scientific and reasonable, and whether the innovation is sufficient;
3. References: Whether the references meet the needs of the paper, whether the professional knowledge can be used, and whether the references are authentic, authoritative and reasonable.
Summary of online teaching and research activities 1
Since the beginning of school, with the in-depth development of the new curriculum