The section titles of the paper include Duel Encounter, Pale Honeymoon, Internship Storm, Embarrassment of Meeting: I was really stupid at that time, Indifference to Emotion, and Quietly Leaving: I don't want any more entanglements, which bloggers call "one of my own in the academic circle". Sharing has won more than 10000 likes, and the papers involved have also attracted attention.
It is understood that the author of the thesis is a grade 20 14 student majoring in education in East China Normal University, and the thesis is a master's degree thesis, which was completed on 20 17.
It can be seen that this paper has been written for some years and passed the defense, which shows that the school still recognizes the academic level of this paper. From the "appearance" point of view, the theme, topic and writing ideas of this paper are divergent, unlike traditional papers. But in fact, there are many so-called "wonderful" papers in recent years, and people have become commonplace.
For example, the influence of star anise on the volatile flavor of braised chicken and its mechanism, the antecedents of gift consistency in couples' relationship and its influence on gift acceptance experience, and the functional study of "hehe" in online conversation. Before, it caused considerable concern on the Internet.
In fact, as long as the paper conforms to academic norms and reflects certain knowledge behind it, what the specific topic is is not so important, and the school should have enough tolerance. Academics should be so divided, and the origin of many great discoveries is only a trivial matter.
What is more noteworthy is actually the theme of this paper-the relationship between teachers and students, to be precise, the conflict between teachers and students, which is quite big. The interviewee of this paper is a classmate who has changed his tutor. The main reason for the conflict is that the tutor and the students have differences on the topic, and the students think that the tutor is "controlling".
This problem is not uncommon because, as pointed out in this paper, it includes the solidification and closure of the tutor admission system, the rigidity and singleness of the tutor-student matching system, the desalination of education and academics, and the singleness of the tutor evaluation subject. These reasons are also common. From this point of view, this paper has considerable value, which makes the topic of teacher-student relationship in colleges and universities academic and gives constructive solutions.
The relationship between tutors and students in universities can sometimes really make the parties have a headache. In the study stage above master's degree, tutors have a great influence on students' academic performance, going abroad for further study and even graduation employment. The relationship between teachers and students is sometimes closer to an "apprenticeship", at least academically speaking, students have a strong dependence on teachers.
However, this close connection will also face some difficulties in the modern education system. The relationship between teachers and students also needs external intervention and supervision, so as to better safeguard the rights and interests of teachers and students. If the mechanism construction is not in place, it will easily lead to the alienation of the relationship between teachers and students and cause all kinds of chaos.
For example, according to media reports, many tutors put forward various "extra" requirements for students, including carrying schoolbags, buying meals, doing housework, being a tutor, being a driver, accompanying wine, getting up early by phone and so on. Conversely, sometimes students will call their teachers "bosses", which shows that the relationship between teachers and students is somewhat abnormal.
In response to this phenomenon, in 2020, the Ministry of Education issued the Code of Conduct for Postgraduate Tutors, which includes that graduate tutors shall not ask graduate students to engage in matters unrelated to their studies, scientific research and social services, and shall not arbitrarily delay the graduation time of graduate students in violation of regulations, pay attention to their studies, employment pressure and mental health, and shall not insult their personality. This criterion has considerable guiding significance, but how to land still needs to formulate more concrete and feasible methods at the school level.
Of course, students are not the only "victims". If there is no flexible mechanism, the tutor will feel embarrassed. For example, a tutor once announced the dissolution of the teacher-student relationship with students on social platforms because he was dissatisfied with some behaviors of students. This extreme practice also shows that without clear rules and coordination mechanisms, the relationship between students and tutors is indeed in a subtle state, which has considerable constraints on both students and teachers.
In short, this "changing tutors" paper should not only be an "interesting topic", but the topic behind it is actually quite serious, and it also needs all sectors of society to explore feasible solutions to make the relationship between teachers and students in colleges and universities more harmonious and pure.