1. First of all, I would like to thank the public for questioning.
As the vice-president of a famous university, he has a very objective and rational attitude towards this matter and the voice of doubt. He didn't complain, but thanked him. This is an excellent public relations, which is of great help to reduce the social impact caused by the incident and ease the focus of Mao Duan.
2. Clarified the questions questioned by netizens.
The query of netizens is mainly influenced by the query put forward by the reviewers of academic websites. The vice president and his team members attached great importance to the questions raised by these people, and re-examined the data appearing in the paper to confirm that the data were not falsified. After further verification of the data and conclusions of the paper, the conclusions in the paper have been further verified, so the contents of these papers are no problem.
There may be some problems in marking the test paper.
Although there is nothing wrong with the content of the paper, there are some mistakes in marking, but this does not involve academic fraud and will not affect the experimental conclusion, so we are currently communicating with the magazine and correcting it as soon as possible.
4. Responses to different viewpoints
Different people have different understandings of the experimental results, and some people say they don't understand. This is normal. As long as the relevant personnel communicate well and discuss the problem in depth, the problem can be solved well.
Therefore, Peking University and the vice president attached great importance to the academic fraud reflected by netizens, specifically clarifying this issue and answering people's doubts. I believe that with these four introductions, everyone can have a more comprehensive understanding of the latest progress of this matter and come to a clear conclusion as soon as possible.