1, the article is beside the point. On the same topic, the three questions asked in the test questions may be completely different, so organize the content according to the questions in the test questions. Some candidates don't look at the three questions carefully when they see the test questions, which is easy to digress. Because the focus of the exam is different, the same article will get a high score in one exam, but it will fail in another exam.

2, the number of words is too small. Need to write more than 250 words, the text needs to write about 2200 words. Of course, in the actual exam, these words include punctuation marks and numbers, so in any case, the number of words should meet the requirements.

3. Too much talk. If the abstract is more than 330 words and the text is more than 2800 words, there are too many words. When practicing writing, you should write in strict accordance with the time and number of words required by the exam to avoid lengthy writing.

4. improper summary. It is a summary and induction of an article to check candidates' generalization, induction and abstraction ability. In the abstract, it is necessary to simply include the key words and arguments of the text, so as to achieve the abstract standard of "knowing the whole content of the article without looking at the text".

This article is too colloquial. The information system project management department should pay attention to the written language when writing any formal documents. Based on the theories in the teaching materials, avoid being too colloquial when writing papers, and put an end to using some popular online terms.

6. The depth of the article is not enough. There are too many measures (methods and techniques) involved in this paper, so I don't want to discuss them in depth. Due to the limitation of words and time, some candidates describe the measures (methods and skills) adopted by the theme project simply, and the article has no depth. When writing a paper, just choose two or three measures (methods and skills) that you think are unique and conduct in-depth discussion. Don't try to cover everything.

7. lack of characteristics. The measures (methods, skills) adopted by the theme project in this paper are all general and list the knowledge points in books and magazines, which is not credible. A high-level paper is actually a summary of experience. Generally, you don't need to discuss the theory in a big space, just talk about how you did it in a certain project. All contents should be closely combined with the theme project and textbook theory, taking the specific content of the theme project as an example.