In reading, blindly pursuing * * * with works may make people lose the consciousness of independent thinking and judgment. In reading teaching, blindly asking students to experience the writer's experience, understand the writer's understanding, pursue the so-called feelings and justice, and emphasize immersion and prosperity, which may also ruin students' sense of questioning and reflection.
Especially in classic reading. Classics seem unattainable, but they have strong potential energy. Readers often consciously or unconsciously put themselves in a subordinate and passive position and exist as imitators, practitioners and appreciators. Many people regard * * * as the highest level of classic reading, especially when reading The Analects of Confucius and Mencius. Blindly pursuing experience and recognition, lacking the consciousness of questioning and dialogue, the spirit of freedom will be exhausted after a long time.
As a classic, of course, it has its value and significance beyond the times and nations, but no classic can be universally applicable. Therefore, speculative reading is the reasonable way to read. Speculative reading emphasizes that readers should focus on the text, not on singing, and take equal dialogue as a bridge to pursue the perfection and transcendence of personal understanding. This is inevitably a process of constant questioning, argumentation, reflection and evaluation, and it is also a process of repeated and spiral development. If the reader loses the ability of independent thinking and judgment and is completely immersed in his own works, it is equivalent to being controlled by the writer. Therefore, we should be a person who can constantly confront writers in reading, maintain an equal dialogue attitude, constantly ask questions about the text and constantly reflect on ourselves!