Question 2: How to write job title evaluation and unit recommendation? During his work in our company, this comrade studied professional knowledge, studied hard and publicized technical problems, and achieved * * * results, saving * * funds for the company and creating * * benefits. In other aspects, the comrade can actively communicate with leaders and colleagues, get along well with the unit, take the initiative to help others, be honest and dare to take responsibility. Ideologically, this comrade actively participated in the party and government work of the company, with high political consciousness, and participated in social welfare activities many times. After research by the unit leaders, it is agreed to recommend this comrade to participate in the evaluation of * * professional titles. * * unit, * * time! Look for reference.
Question 3: Do you agree or disagree with the contents, advantages and disadvantages of expert opinions in the recommendation form of the Expert Academic Committee?
Question 4: How to write the title of peer expert review representative 2?
Fill in the form and explain.
First, this table is for college teachers and natural science research, experimental technology, social science (education management
) The application for senior post qualification of researcher is submitted to peer experts for appraisal. 2. Requirements for filling in the form: 1-3, 4 and 7 pages of "Representative Title" shall be filled in by the applicant, and shall be examined and sealed by the personnel department of the school; Figures are filled in by the Provincial Department of Education. Three, this form can be copied, but it must be printed on both sides, and the layout and page number cannot be changed.
Representative evaluation requirements
First, the identification of representative works is a serious work and an important link to ensure the quality of evaluation. The evaluation experts should be highly responsible and realistic, and make an appropriate and fair evaluation according to the actual level of the representatives and the declared professional and technical positions. Avoid situations where the evaluation is too strict or too wide.
Two, "representative evaluation" refers to the evaluation of each representative provided by the applicant. Experts are invited to fill in the submitted papers and works one by one. "Comprehensive evaluation opinions on representative works" refers to the comprehensive evaluation opinions on the academic achievements, personal research ability or some shortcomings of the applicant's representative works. "Expert appraisal conclusion" must clearly put forward whether it meets the requirements of promotion to the corresponding position. The opinions are divided into three levels: ① the academic level meets the post requirements; (2) The academic level basically meets the post requirements; ③ The academic level has not yet reached the post requirements. Ask the experts to tick "√" on the corresponding options. After completing the relevant columns, experts should sign the Expert Appraisal Conclusion (B).
Three, to declare senior positions and promote deputy senior positions on behalf of the personnel determined by the experts with senior positions, deputy senior positions on behalf of the personnel determined by the experts with senior positions.
4. Ask the experts to send the Peer Expert Appraisal Form together with the representative (original) to the personnel department of our school, but not directly to the applicant or the school where the applicant is located.
5. Please ask the personnel department of the school where the expert is located to sign the opinions in the corresponding column on page 7 and affix the official seal, and then return the materials to the Education Department of Fujian Province.
I sincerely thank all the experts and their schools for their strong support to the evaluation of professional and technical positions of teaching and research personnel in colleges and universities in Fujian Province!
wenku.baidu/...eDycbu
Question 5: What is the recommendation of the expert committee in the recommendation form for professional and technical personnel title evaluation? Urgent! 5 points agree to recommend!
Question 6: How to write the professional title in the recommendation letter of professional title declaration of forestry professionals? It turns out that the title comes from the title. Theoretically speaking, professional title refers to the professional technical level, ability and achievements of professional and technical personnel, reflecting their technical level and working ability. Academically, it has the nature of academic title; On the professional and technical level, it has the nature of a post. Professional skills.
Question 7: How to write the expert appraisal opinions of senior engineers reviewing papers? The common tedious titles are:' Study on rapid analysis method of chemical composition in molten steel'. In this kind of topic, omitting the words' about' and' research' will not affect the expression. As a paper, what aspects of research and investigation does the general contractor include, so the above topic can be refined as' rapid analysis of chemical composition of molten steel'. In this way, the number of words is reduced from 2 1 to 12, which is clear and concise to read.
Question 8: How to fill in the opinions of grass-roots units for the promotion of intermediate engineers? The content of the opinions of the grass-roots units is not filled in by themselves, but evaluated by the units according to your performance, and the opinions of agreeing with this comrade's promotion are written.
Question 9: There are _ _ _ _ _ _ bidders who are professional title evaluation experts, and they are: ————————————————————————
In the preliminary review, the compliance and completeness of the bidding documents of _ _ _ _ bidders meet the requirements of the bidding documents, and enter the detailed review. The situation is as follows: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Through comprehensive evaluation, the scores and rankings of all bidders are as follows: ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
According to the above review results and the relevant provisions of the tender documents, it is suggested that:
The first successful candidate:
Second successful candidate:
Question 10: How to write the evaluation opinion of the thesis on promotion to the post of professor?
Definition: first point out the essence of the other party's mistake, then refute the wrong argument pointed out, and at the same time or after refuting, put forward your own correct point of view to prove it.
Three elements of argumentative writing: argument, argument and argumentation
Write an opinion according to the topic and then explain it. Persuasive ability is very important, and three elements are indispensable. Take a closer look at the following specific introduction, and you can try to write more in the future to make your composition progress. In addition, famous sayings, aphorisms and celebrity examples should be registered in order to be better used in the composition. Generally speaking, the argument of argumentation is to solve the problem of "what to prove", argumentation is to solve the problem of "what to prove" and argumentation is to solve the problem of "how to prove".
[3] argument
Argument is a sentence that correctly and clearly expounds the author's point of view, and it is the soul and commander of an article. Any article has only one central argument, and generally there can be sub-arguments.
The argument should be correct, clear and general, and the complete judgment sentence should never be ambiguous.
(1) correctness: the persuasiveness of the argument is rooted in the correct reflection of objective things, which in turn depends on whether the author's position, viewpoint, attitude and method are correct. If the argument itself is incorrect or even absurd, no amount of arguments can convince people. Therefore, the correct argument is the minimum requirement for argumentative writing.
2 Significantness: What is for and what is against should be very clear, and it must not be ambiguous or ambiguous.
Novelty: the argument should be as novel and profound as possible, which can transcend other people's views. It's not repeating other people's platitudes, nor is it irrelevant and general. It should be as unique and novel as possible.
An argument generally has four positions: the title, the beginning, the middle of the article and the end. But it is more often at the beginning of the article, and so is the paragraph argument. When similar statements appear at the beginning and the end, the starting argument and the ending echo argument.
Some argumentative arguments are expressed in clear sentences in the article, and we just need to find them out; Others are not directly expressed in clear sentences and need to be refined and summarized by readers themselves. The summarized sentence should not contain rhetorical devices.
Note: rhetorical questions and figurative sentences cannot be used as arguments, but must be declarative sentences.