Writing argumentative essays "in line with stylistic requirements" mainly focuses on abstract thinking, mainly for the purpose of convincing people. 1111... style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style, style and style (1) From the content point of view, an argumentative essay has three elements: ① an argument. Argument is the soul of argumentative writing, and sub-argument is the skeleton supporting this soul. The argument should be correct, clear, concise and rigorous, and should not be ambiguous. Views can be put forward at the beginning, summarized at the end of the article, and some also appear in the article, depending on the specific situation. (2) argue. Argument is the flesh and blood of argumentative writing. It is inconceivable that a person should be full and colorful, with only a soul and skeleton and no flesh and blood. An argumentative essay, with only central arguments and sub-arguments, cannot be called an article. There must also be typical and vivid arguments. The parameter must be internally consistent with the parameter. There must be arguments. Argumentation is reasoning. It is a process of finding the internal logical connection between arguments through the analysis of arguments to prove arguments. Argumentation can be carried out directly from the front, that is, through theoretical analysis and fact verification; It can also be done indirectly from the opposite side, that is, using hypothesis to falsify or using extension to expose fallacies to refute. If you really want to master thorough argumentation, you should also learn dialectical analysis. (2) In terms of thinking process, argumentative writing has three processes: ① Asking questions, that is, the usual introduction, is starting from the research object (material or topic) and entering the topic. After dialectical analysis, it reveals the essence and leads to the argument. (2) Analysis of problems, that is, the usual theory, is to prove or falsify arguments through facts or theories. 3 draw a conclusion, that is, the usual conclusion, that is, through in-depth analysis, get the correct result. (3) According to the nature of argumentation, there are three main forms of reasoning used in argumentation. ① Inductive reasoning. That is, draw general conclusions from individual things in reality. There are many similar things in the world. If we can't enumerate the anatomy one by one, we need to analyze some typical cases and draw general truth from them. The characteristics of this method are from individual to general, from concrete to abstract, which accords with people's cognitive law. Dissect a sparrow and you can know the basic structure of all sparrows. ② Deductive reasoning. This is a way of reasoning from the general to the individual, that is, a method of proving special things with general principles as arguments, which is used to deepen understanding and lead to new ideas. The way is to start from the known and credible scientific principle, and then analyze a specific situation according to this principle, and draw the conclusion of this specific problem. Because the whole thing is like this, then any one of them must be like this. ③ Analogical reasoning. This is a way of reasoning from individual to individual, from known cases to similar cases. The method is to give some examples with the same nature and attributes as the object under discussion, then put forward the problems to be demonstrated, compare them, point out their * * * nature, and draw a conclusion. An argumentative essay can only use one reasoning method or several reasoning methods. (4) A good argumentative essay has three distinct characteristics. (1) targeted, that is, to have a clear discussion purpose, content and object. Theoretical means to analyze the truth, to have opinions and to have theories. (3) Logic is to analyze the inevitable relationship between things, which is very convincing. 2222 ..... Methods Means Means Means Means Means Means Means Means Means Means Means (1) Argument, argument, argument, all of which have three elements. (2) there should be "ideological content" and focus on discussion. (I am thinking and designing) (3) There is a symbolic language. (title, head, paragraph, tail) 3. 3.3.3. Means of exhibition Means of exhibition (1) is based on reality, and sees the big from the small. Explaining or clarifying abstract and profound truth through small familiar things is called "seeing the big from the small"; It is related to the natural society, the fate of life and the universe, and we can also find a thinking and speaking angle, which is the so-called "big topic and small work". In the face of the proposition of composition, it is more just the intercommunication, complementarity and mutual proof between the big and the small. In view of the proposition, based on reality, big and small interaction, two efforts: first, focus on the relationship between people and society, take the objective outward road, and attach importance to philosophical sentiment. The second is to pay attention to the observation of people, take the subjective inward road and attach importance to human nature. Please write an article of at least 800 words on the topic of "Curiosity, Curiosity, Curiosity and Re-Curiosity". This paper analyzes the statement that "some people are curious only in childhood", and suggests that candidates pay more attention to the existence of their own "curiosity" rather than simply describing or vaguely evaluating curiosity. Whose "curiosity"? What kind of "curiosity"? Whose curiosity is it? What kind of "curiosity"? Whose "curiosity"? How to show it, why, how to do it, and how to ... fully speculate on what is related to what. (2) Taking care of development is meaningful in comparison. Whether the composition proposition needs further judgment or not, it is of great significance to read the proposition from a developmental perspective and explore or construct values in the context of exploration. Then there is horizontal comparative analysis, which is not only an important way for people to know things, but also a useful way for self-composition. Contrast or comparison can reveal similarities and differences, and there must be connections and differences if there are similarities and differences. Grasping the differences revealed by comparison, finding the characteristics and understanding the essence will be profound. Taking care of development and comparison can be a comparative analysis before and after a certain situation, a comparative analysis between things of different nature, and an analogy analysis between things of the same nature. Example: Take "crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested, crested. There are crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested crested We can't simply describe or discuss "phoenix head, pig belly and leopard tail" as the beginning, middle and end of things. We should fully understand the specific meaning of "brilliant, bright, rich, loud and powerful" in the introduction to ensure that the object of discussion really has such attributes. On this basis, initiation and attachment are valuable and meaningful. (3) pay attention to dialectics and see reason in things. In view of the composition proposition, it is difficult to make things meaningful, and it is inevitable to say them in vain. Therefore, it is necessary to trace the root of the formation of things, analyze the elements of the problem, infer the development trend of the situation, and find the essence step by step in the dialectical thinking of reality and reality, so as to draw a conclusion. According to the type attribute of composition proposition, we can combine the concrete process, image description, personality interpretation and deep understanding between matter and reason. Abstraction should be concrete, concrete should be abstract, virtual questions should be real, and real questions should be blurred. The dialectic between matter and reason focuses on reason, and the most direct and clear way is to explore cause and effect, or trace the cause from the conclusion, or deduce the result from the cause. Example: Write an article of not less than 800 words on the topic of "wisdom water, wisdom water, wisdom water, stable mountain, stable mountain, stable mountain". From the perspective of the influence of landscape as a natural scenery on people, this paper analyzes the relationship between different local customs formed by large writable regional differences and small writable personal temperament and landscape regional conditions. From "Smart Sea Keep Blue All the Year Round", I write the traditional essence of China women's modernity and kindness, and write about reform and opening up and adhering to China characteristics. From "a calm mountain changes into different scenery all year round", it is related to the principle of being a man and the art of doing things, to a certain artistic feature and its various forms, and so on. It can be written in two ways. We can start with the metaphorical meaning of mountains and rivers, such as the integration of national character and culture, the diversity of writers' creative styles and the consistency of ideological character, and the unity of opposites of yin and yang beauty. For example, the Chinese civilization with mountains and rivers can be written as the origin of the Yellow River civilization and the Yangtze River civilization from the Himalayas, praising the rough and broad-minded Chinese civilization but euphemistically delicate; For example, writing literature and art with mountains and rivers can be written from Su Shi's boldness to Li Qingzhao's grace, and even from Lu You's anti-gold ambition to his sadness with Tang Waner, and so on. Of course, you can also write about daily life, such as comparing men and women to mountains and rivers, and writing about the interdependent social relations between men and women. From the perspective of life, we can write the life course composed of various bumpy contradictions, thus clarifying the dialectical truth of change and eternity, movement and stillness.