1. Image Diffusion and the Crisis of Current Literature, China Social Sciences, No.5, 2004, 18000 words.

2. The iconology route of aesthetic research, Literature Review No.2, 20 12, 14300 words.

3. Towards global dialogism-beyond cultural imperialism and its critics, Literature Review,No. 1 issue, No.20 1 issue, 1.82 million words.

4. Four Problems of Western Aesthetics in the 20th Century, Literature Review, No.3, 2009, 1500 words.

5. Globalization as a philosophy and the issue of "world literature", Literature Review, No.5, 2006,1.4000 words.

6. From image to simulacra, Literature Review, No.2, 2005, with 7000 words.

7. "Towards Zero Distance and the Current Literary Crisis", Literature Review, No.2, 2004, 1.8 million words.

8. Crossing the Line in Fiction and Imagination, Dialogue and Literary Criticism, No.4, 2002,1.20,000 words.

9. Modern Dimensions of schleiermacher's Hermeneutics, Literature Review, No.6, 200 1,1.1.50,000 words.

10. Schopenhauer's imagination theory and its possible value, Literature Review No.4, 1998, with 13700 words attached.

1 1. Critical Outline of Marxist Literary Criticism, No.4 Literary Criticism 1987, 18000 words.

12. wholeness and intuition-on Heisenberg's aesthetic thought, Philosophical Studies, No.8, 20 14, p. 122- 126.

13. Symbol and Attribute-A Post-structuralist Interpretation of Laozi's Text, Philosophical Studies, No.8, 20 13, pp. 49-58.

14. Globalization and the End of World Literature, Philosophical Studies,No. 10, 2007,10/10,000 words.

15. Confucius Thought and World Peace-On Subjectivity and Others, Philosophical Studies, No.2, 2002, 12000 words.

16. From Transcendence to Experience, Philosophical Studies,No. 10, 2000, 1. 1.8 million words.

17. On Schopenhauer's Aesthetic Ontology, Philosophical Research 1995No. 10, 14000 words.

18. Social Aesthetics in the Consumption Age, Literature and Art Research,No. 12, 2006, 16300 words.

19. Between Words and Meaning, Literature Research, No.5, 2002, 14500 words.

20. Nietzsche and China's Modernity, Literary Studies, No.6, 2000, 1.33 million words.

2 1. Subjectivity and the Other, Dialogue and Literary Studies,No. 1, 2000, 1.44 million words.

22. On Schopenhauer's Aesthetic Epistemology, Literary Studies, No.2, 1997, attached with 13000 words.

23. The Destruction of Metaphysics, Foreign Literature Review No.2, 1987, 12000 words.

24. The Birth of Meaning, Foreign Literature Review No.4,1988,9500 words.

25. Schopenhauer on Madness and Artistic Creation, Foreign Literature Review No.3, 1997, with 12300 words attached.

26. Forever Rhetorical Reading and Dialogue, Foreign Literature Review 200 1No. 1, 9500 words.

27. The Deconstruction Limit of Nature and Culture —— Thinking after Derrida, Foreign Literature Review, No.4, 2008, 654.38+04000 words.

28. The power of resistance is by no means from the discourse level-a criticism of Hall's coding/decoding model, Literature Theory Research No.2, 20 10, 12300 words.

29. The Poetics of Resisting Audience-; Preface to the English version of Literary Theory Research, No.2, 20 1 1, 0.7 1 ten thousand words.

30. "Image-Entertainment" or "Aesthetic-Entertainment" —— A Review of Pozmann's Social Aesthetics, Foreign Literature, No.6, 20 10/0,7500 words.

3 1. There is no "Hou" in theory —— From Eagleton, Foreign Literature, No.2, 2009, 4800 words.

32. A Definition, a History —— Williams' Theoretical Contribution to the History of British Cultural Studies, Foreign Literature, No.4, 2006, 6000 words.

33. The ups and downs of the subject and our post-modernity, Foreign Literature, No.6, 200 1 4,200 words.

34. Infinite Other-Reading A Core Concept of Levinas, No.3 issue of Taipei Philosophy and Culture Monthly in 2005, with 654.38+03,000 words.

35. The Benevolence of Confucius: A Postmodern Interpretation, Taipei Philosophy and Culture Monthly, No.4, 2003, 12500 words.

36. On Schopenhauer's Empiricism, Taipei Philosophy and Culture Monthly,No. 12, 2000, 2 10000 words.

37. Scientism and the Establishment of Modern Hermeneutics in Germany, Taipei Philosophy and Culture Monthly,No. 12, 20,000 words.

38. Where does the resistance come from? On David Morley's Active Audience Theory, No.6, 1, 201,Taipei, 28000 words.

39. Confucius Thought and Subjectivity, Journal of Confucius and Mencius, Taipei, 2002 (total) 80,65,438+09,000 words.

40. Inner feelings and free will, Taipei Journal of Philosophy, 200 1 1 (34 issues in total),1.20,000 words.

4 1. Nietzsche and Modernity, Taipei Journal of Philosophy, 200 1,1(37 issues in total),1.6,000 words.

42. The combination of values: a possible way out of the stalemate between China and the West, in Taylor (summary by SSCI and william smith). A&HCI), summer of 20 15 (17 1), p.18-123.

43. Bashir Makhall's installation "Into the Ghost, Out of the Ghost": Revenge of Images. Society (London: Sage), 20 12, vol. 29, 7/8, pp. 358-37 1. (Excerpted by SSCI et al. )

44. The result of industrialization is rubbish, which, in theory, is incompatible with culture. Society (London: Sage), 20 1 1, Volume 28 (7-8), pp. 354-357. (Excerpted by SSCI et al. )

45. Active Audience and British Cultural Studies: David & #183; Interview with Professor Morley. Society (London: Sage), 20 1 1, Volume 28 (4), Page 124- 144. (Excerpted by SSCI et al. )

46. simulacra: an aestheticization or a non-aestheticization. Society (London: Sage), Volume 25, No.6, 2008, page 139- 147. (Excerpted by SSCI et al. )

47. Redefine global knowledge. Society (London: Sage), 2007, Volume 24, No.7/8, pp. 276-280. (Excerpted by SSCI et al. )

48. Neo-Confucianism and Post-modernism, inApoklypsa, Volume 66, Ljubina, 2003, pp. 133- 143.

49. Literatura Kot Dejianje Presto Panjiameje, Dr. Intervju-Dialogues Professors Jem Wolfgang Omi Serjem, in Comparative Literature, Volume 25, No.2, Ljubia, 20021February, pp. 77-88. (Note: This article is in Serbian).

50. Pedigree and Possible Future of Cultural Studies: An Interview with Tony Bennett, Cultural Politics (Oxford: Berg), Vol.4, No.2, 2008, pp. 16 1- 182.

5 1. A global interlocutor. Uuml Bellwin Donders & ampraquo cultural imperialism & Ampraquo and the most important position, in: Lena winter (mercury. )，Die Zukunft der culture Studies:Theorie，cultur und Gesellschaft im 2 1。 Jahrhundert, bielefeld: codex, 20 1 1, S. 197-2 18. (Note: This article is in German)

1, Consuming Others: Cultural Prospect of Globalization and Capitalism, Commercial Press, 20 14.

2. Global Dialogue, Beijing: Emerging Press, 20 13.

3. Active Audience: Birmingham Paradigm from Hall to Molly, Beijing: China Social Publishing House, 20 10.

4. History of Western Aesthetics, Volume IV, China Social Sciences Press, 2008 (Hui Minjin is the first author and the person in charge of the volume, such as Ru Xin is responsible for the achievements of the National Social Science Fund).

5. The Turn of Post-Confucianism, Henan University Press, 2008.

6. The Consequence of Media: Critical Theory of the End of Literature, Traditional Chinese Edition of Taiwan Province Commercial Press, June 2005; Simplified Chinese version of People's Publishing House, June 5438+February 2005.

7. Postmodernism and Dialectical Hermeneutics, China Social Sciences Press, 2002.

8. Will and Transcendence: A Study of Schopenhauer's Aesthetic Thought, China Social Sciences Press, first edition in April 1999, reprinted in March 2007.

9. Anti-metaphysics and Modern Aesthetic Spirit, Guangxi Education Press, 1997.

10, Practical Philosophy of Hermeneutic Aesthetics, translated (Gadamer, Dutt), the Commercial Press, first edition in March 2005, reprinted in March 2007 (note: the original text is in German).

1 1, Reading Behavior, Hunan Literature and Art Publishing House, 1992, translated by Walter Ezelle, with the main translation (note: the original text is in English).

12, Epic Theory, Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House, 1989, translated by Paul Merchant, the main translation (originally in English). Jin Huimin: Active Audience: A New Materialist Interpretation of a Key Concept in Cultural Studies, Bielefeld: Codex, 20 12.

This book is the audience theory research of British cultural studies of Birmingham School and the first academic monograph on this subject in the English-speaking world. This is not only the academic combing and research of Birmingham's audience theory, but also the promotion of the audience theory itself, which has theoretical innovation significance. Professor Reina Winter's evaluation: Professor Jin put forward a new materialistic concept about active audience. Through this concept, he tried to prove that if we are not limited to the level of discourse, then the experience and practice of the audience and the real existence of the audience can be properly understood. ..... Jin Huimin has unusual hermeneutic sensitivity, which enables him to open up and show new research directions and theoretical perspectives. (The translation was published in Comparative Literature of ChinaNo. 1 No.20 12) In the current literary theory circle in China, it is rare to directly discuss western hot issues in western languages. In this respect, Mr. Jin Huimin has set an example for contemporary literary critics to actively participate in international academic exchanges. For Mr. Jin, this is the phased achievement of his study of western aesthetics and western literary theory, and it is also the inevitable result of his unremitting pursuit of internationalization for many years. We believe that this is just a good beginning. In the near future, Mr. Jin will publish more and better academic works in foreign languages. "(from Mr. Chen Dingjia's article)

English abstract:

Although there are many retrospective works on cultural studies, so far, no book has been devoted to the historical and theoretical investigation of the relationship between British cultural studies and Birmingham School's active audience theory and its heritage.

However, this book is not only a reconstruction of the theory of active audience, because Jin Huimin initially developed new theoretical insights through critical comments on the classic "coding/decoding" model of S tuart Hall and careful reading of David Morley's pioneering ethnographic audience research. King questioned the positive audience discourse model put forward by Hall and Molly, and expounded a new materialistic audience view facing 2 1 century.