After the rich man donated money, he was surprised by the third family's "charity" idea, but at the same time he admired their euphemistic refusal. While doing charity, he also knows what he has gained.

The third family is not indifferent to the donation of the rich. They also hesitated: "Do you want to accept it or not?" But in the end, their small thoughts were finally overwhelmed by self-esteem. They think that although people are poor, they should also be poor with backbone. Every penny they spend must be their own hard-earned money and accept charity from others. What is this?

Yes, their ideas are really admirable. In the face of money and self-esteem, they choose to have self-esteem. It can be seen that they are the kind with strong self-esteem.

But it does reflect a state of mind of modern people. Why do they think so? It must be connected with society. Everyone's self-esteem is so strong now. Others always refuse to donate things on the grounds of so-called "charity". Is this really charity? Isn't this reason a high threshold in your heart? It's just that they can't pass, saying that they don't accept "charity". They thought, "Although we are poor, we must be so poor that others can't look down on us and step on us." Yes, I do agree with this idea, but who says that accepting donations from others is spineless, that is, letting others look down on it, that is, letting others step on it? Why don't they let the weak accept the help of the strong? How can this kind of help be charity? Help each other, isn't it the only shortcut to make the motherland strong? Why should the strong help the weak? In fact, they want the weak to become strong quickly, and then the strong will help the weak. If we go through this cycle, our motherland will be strong and fast, and China will reduce the weak. This is the main purpose of help. Besides, this is just a simple help, which is given by our compatriots. Embrace it, don't you?

If everyone thinks this kind of help is charity and an insult to themselves in the future, it may collapse because of the elimination of society. If everyone's self-esteem is still so strong, it may make others look down upon it, make the motherland lag behind and make foreigners look down upon it. Is this what we want? Self-esteem is just to comfort myself, but I don't know that it is hurting donors, so that people with ability can develop a mentality: "I won't do charity anymore, because I can't help people, but I will be misunderstood as charity, so let them die of poverty!" In this way, the weak can't get help and have no ability. If this continues, the consequences will be really unimaginable. I'm afraid that under the self-esteem of the weak, it will cause a series of bad things, and even harm others and themselves, which is beyond our estimation.

So how should we solve it? It takes someone who tied the bell to solve the problem, and the source of the problem is trust and acceptance. We can only let the society build a bridge of trust between the strong and the weak, give an equal name, call both sides equal, and let both sides accept each other's trust. Perhaps, we can call on the strong to do more charity, and give psychological counseling to the weak, tell them what help is and what charity is, and teach them to learn to accept it. Only by turning "charity" into "help" can we do it. The problem after the millionaire donated money is really thought-provoking. What are the hidden problems behind charity? Is it trust? Do you accept? Is it equal? Perhaps these "small" problems can only be eliminated from some people's hearts if they are solved. Only in this way can the strong help the weak better.