I. Profound arguments
Theory is the process of explaining discrimination, three-dimensional thinking, point-line-surface-point, which is what we usually call argumentation, unfolding argumentation and regression argumentation. Many candidates can clearly find the main points, but the main problems focus on two aspects: first, they can't speak Mandarin, and their thinking and consciousness are correct, but their language is not written and informal; second, their thinking is narrow and often concentrated in one aspect, which is not comprehensive enough.
Example: Analyze the crux of environmental deterioration.
Many candidates may think of the unreasonable industrial structure of the country and the wrong view of political achievements of local governments, but it is difficult to carry out it. At the same time, the lack of too much language will inevitably make the paragraphs that should be deeply analyzed look dry. In the process of accumulation, we can pay attention to the analysis from different angles such as subjective and objective factors, internal and external factors, macro and micro, and if necessary, we can recite some written angles to expand our language reserve.
For example, the above analysis can be extended to:
Objectively speaking, environmental pollution is the product of a certain stage of economic and social development. Due to the rapid expansion of population, the acceleration of urbanization and the increase of resource consumption, it will inevitably cause pollution and destruction to the environment. The environmental problems left over from history have not yet been solved, and new environmental problems have followed. At present, the mode of development is still relatively extensive, and the contradiction between economic growth and environmental protection is still acute. Local governments pay too much attention to "GDP" when measuring political achievements, which leads to local governments spending money on projects. Some local officials would rather give up the ecological environment and public health, but also keep their jobs and the "God of Wealth", without really sorting out Scientific Outlook on Development's views on political achievements.
This paragraph analyzes the causes of environmental pollution from both objective and subjective aspects. The objective analysis will let the examiner see the examinee's profound understanding of environmental issues, while the subjective analysis also appropriately uses some grounded expressions: "one's own job" and "God of Wealth", forming a relatively smooth and round paragraph without many conjunctions.
Second, the appropriate case study
Reasoning and stating facts are common argumentation methods in argumentative writing. In order to avoid being too boring, too vague and ungrounded, many candidates will use examples to demonstrate their papers in paragraphs. This is certainly a desirable method. However, there are many problems in the actual operation process: cases are all from given materials, cases are dragged around, and case references are vague.
Example: We should use "heavy code" to solve environmental problems.
Many candidates will think of many solutions, such as changing the concept of environmental protection, strengthening supervision and management, increasing punishment and establishing a long-term mechanism. Worried that it was too empty and dry, I introduced examples, but it was not too much with the previous countermeasures, so I gild the lily, but I can make the following improvements:
For example, stones from other mountains can attack jade. London used to be a famous foggy city. 1952 After the London smog incident, the British government first promulgated the Clean Air Act in 1956 and the Air Quality Act in 1974. The United States, Japan and other countries have also fundamentally reversed the trend of environmental deterioration through the rule of law. Although China has done a lot of work in environmental legislation and law enforcement, people generally feel that environmental lawsuits are still difficult to fight. If you want to solve the problem, you need to make more efforts. The strictest system and the strictest rule of law are the reliable guarantee for the construction of ecological civilization.
When accumulating materials, I suggest you read carefully, analyze the composition of each sentence, analyze the composition of each paragraph, and analyze the direction of each point of view. After all the analysis from the outside to the inside, from the inside to the outside, throw away the article and start repeating the question, and try to say and remember every point mentioned in the article just now. Over time, you will find that your mind is getting thicker and thicker, your ideas are getting wider and wider, and your articles are becoming more and more meaningful.
I wish the majority of candidates a smooth preparation for customs clearance!