1. The content of the paper should be innovative, and there should be new theories, new ideas, new processes and new methods in the paper. The arguments of scientific papers are first put forward, discovered or recognized by the author.
2. When writing scientific papers, the materials should be structured, logical, clear-cut, accurate in data, objective in description, sufficient in arguments, and rigorous and logical in argumentation.
3. The paper should be short, with the least words and the shortest length, and accurately express the scientific research results. At the same time, the text should be concise and fluent, avoid vague description, and use academic or professional terms.
The text structure of scientific papers consists of title, author, abstract, key words, preface, materials and methods, results, discussion and conclusion.
Title: Write the basic content of this study simply and accurately.
Author: name, title (or position)
Briefly explain the purpose and importance of this study, extremely briefly describe what experimental materials and methods are used to draw what research conclusions, and highlight the significance of new insights and research results.
Keywords: this is a vocabulary to express the concept of literature theme, which can be put forward from the title and abstract (usually 3-4 keywords are put forward), and the keywords can be indexed by retrieval journals (or databases) for scientific and technological personnel at home and abroad to consult.
Foreword (or introduction, introduction): Briefly describe the background of this research topic, the previous research results and unsolved problems, as well as the main experimental content and research purpose of this research.
Materials and Methods: The experimental materials, experimental conditions, experimental methods, theoretical basis and specific experimental operation steps used in this study are written in detail.
Results: Objectively describe and scientifically analyze the phenomena in the experiment. Write down the applied formulas and reaction equations; List the data obtained in the experiment accurately with tables, coordinate diagrams or curves; State the final result of the experiment.
Discussion: Discussion is to raise the perceptual knowledge in experimental research to the level of rational knowledge. The key content is to scientifically analyze the experimental data and phenomena, explain the data errors and factors affecting the experimental results, and explore the improvement of experimental materials and methods. In the writing of discussion, the expression should be comprehensive, dialectical and objective, and not arbitrary.
Conclusion: Judging the value, function and significance of the research results shows what new laws have been discovered, what academic theories have been developed and what practical problems can be solved.