It is terrible that students are oppressed by their tutors.

(The original text comes from the official account of WeChat WeChat, "The Great Trend", /s/zuche 5 hqisrxdwdwqd 00xkmg)

10 June10, Dr. Hou Jingjing, a chemical engineer from Zhejiang University, committed suicide by investing in Qiantang River. Not long ago, a resignation letter from Dr. Xu Shilian of Monash University shocked the Internet, which opened people's eyes and revealed the doctor's painful life.

Details of the resignation form are as follows:

Lessons from your college and university leaders:

My doctoral study at Northwestern Polytechnical University will begin in March 20 17. After careful consideration, I decided to complete my doctoral study and research at Northwestern Polytechnical University before the start of the doctoral program in the spring of 20 17. Thanks to Life College and Northwestern Polytechnical University for their teaching, understanding and sincerity.

Everyone likes to speculate and talk about whether to stay or not, which is wrong, regardless of public or private. Better know what happened.

The following is an explanation for this decision:

My resignation has nothing to do with the treatment or the trouble of getting along with others. It is because I have been afraid to agree with Professor Wang, the chief scientist of the Center for Ecology and Environmental Protection of Northwestern Polytechnical University, on the teaching philosophy, academic attitude, research methods and management strategies of the research team. When I have a deeper understanding of the research center of ecology and environmental protection of Northwestern Polytechnical University and the research team of Professor Wang, the chief scientist, the most appropriate method is to voluntarily withdraw.

During these nine months, my study and research work was passive and reluctant everywhere, but the time was ruthless and my career was abandoned. I am eager to go back to the laboratory, work alone at my desk, and continue my doctoral study and research.

I know that this decision stems from my inadaptability and unwillingness to the Center for Ecology and Environmental Protection of Northwestern Polytechnical University and its chief scientist Professor Wang's research team. The progress of science lies in: seeking truth from facts and being pragmatic; The essence of being a man and doing things lies in: being upright and being practical. My departure will reduce and avoid unnecessary waste of educational resources in doctoral teaching and scientific research at Northwestern Polytechnical University.

Once again, I sincerely thank Northwestern Polytechnical University for accepting and trusting my doctoral program. I feel deeply ashamed and guilty that I don't deserve a pseudonym. Nine months of study and research work is my precious life experience. Although I finally resigned, I'm afraid my feelings for this center and research work are deeper than you can understand.

Thank the college leaders for their approval in advance.

I am here to convey

Salute!

2065438+September 2008?

Professor Wang, Chief Scientist of the Research Center for Ecology and Environmental Protection of Northwestern Polytechnical University.

The inside story of this scene is looming. As a young doctor, regardless of the bright future, he resolutely gave up his studies at home and went abroad only to resume his research work, for fear that "time is ruthless and his career will be destroyed." I burst into tears after reading it!

Nine feet of ice was not made in a day. ...

First, for a long time, tutors have oppressed students miserably.

1. The student rabbit trembled under the mouth of the wolf's tutor. Most of the students selected by the school are young, kind and simple white rabbits. They have neither the courage and resources to fight with their tutors nor the social experience of fighting, so they are pinched by their tutors. Students are too weak to swallow anything in order not to affect their studies. Under the leadership of great leaders, it is better to do more than one thing, so as to maintain a stable overall situation, Amitabha. Twenty years ago, Gao Yan, a girl who was sexually assaulted by her mentor yang shen, committed suicide by jumping off a building. The suicide note sadly wrote:

I made a list.

On the left is the reason to live.

On the right is the reason for leaving this world.

I wrote a lot on the right.

Only to find that there is basically nothing to write on the left.

……

2. Jumping off a building has become a tragic and desperate struggle for students. Peking University, Tsinghua University, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Xi Jiaotong University, Xi University of Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, etc. These schools are all the best universities in Chinese mainland, but the means by which tutors oppress students are extremely poor, and students jump off buildings frequently, such as sexually assaulting female students at Peking University, Wuhan Institute of Technology, jumping off buildings by masters from Xi 'an Jiaotong University, jumping off buildings by doctors from Xi 'an University of Technology, Beihang University, etc .. Oh, my God, is this still a university? After all, jumping off a building is a minority. What choices will those who have not jumped off the building make? Compromise with fate, or go against it? Students live like dogs.

There's nowhere to run, even dropping out of school. Students are dropping out of school? The doctor must attend the president's regular meeting to drop out of school, and at the same time he must pass the president's regular meeting to drop out of school. It is not so easy to climb out of this pit. Either you graduate with a doctorate and put it in a box, or you defect (you can't get the file back). From 20 15 to 20 18, there have been more than 10 resignations of doctoral students, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers and research assistants, as well as many students jumping off buildings because of the oppression and humiliation of their tutors. The oppression and destruction inside sadly reminds us of the "nineteen jumps" of Foxconn, a sweatshop!

Second, academic research fraud by hook or by crook, boldly defrauding funds.

20 1, on March 26th, 2006, Nature Biotechnology published Han Chunyu's paper entitled "Using natronomicron gregoryiargonaute for DNA-guided genome editing". After repeated argumentation by many foreign research institutions, the results are inconsistent, causing an uproar in the world, and China enjoys a world-renowned academic reputation.

1. The auditing system is full of loopholes. In fact, if you think about it carefully, there are institutional problems. In reviewing papers, it is impossible for reviewers to repeat the experiment, and the most important thing is to see whether the viewpoint is good or not and the method is right; In this process, it mainly depends on how many papers there are, and no one will check the authenticity of the experimental data. In other words, in all the processes, no one will repeat the experiment and no one will verify the authenticity of the data. Even Nature Biotechnology didn't seem to repeat Han Chunyu's experiment before it was published. The article has been published. Who will look at the data carefully? Even if you read the data carefully, who will repeat the experiment? There are no parallel experiments in most schools in China. In foreign countries, all experiments must be published at least three parallel experiments. If this achievement has no great theoretical significance and application value, such as the revolutionary significance of Han Chunyu's gene editing tool NgAgo, otherwise who will repeat the experiment? After all, it takes money and manpower to do experiments. Even if the experiment is repeated, it is not necessarily repeated, such as different materials. If you can't repeat the experiment many times, there will definitely be problems with the results, and it is impossible to get Jie Qing's money back. It is impossible to cancel Jie Qing. Wow, all the money has been spent. The spent money flows out like water and can't be collected. This provides a natural and excellent soil for China to cheat in academic fraud and obtain funds.

Academic fraud is ten thousand times more profitable than drug trafficking. How to defraud the national scientific research funds? There are too many ways. It's easy to set up a company account. I can get by on the face. Who will check it carefully? Get tens of millions of research funds, don't do experiments, don't buy instruments, what about the money? Let's talk about it when we get it. It is not easy to find a brand to quote some money. For example, in biological research, it says consumables, serum (FCS, NCS), saying that after the experiment, you can't go to the sewer to get FCS back, right? For example, if you find an advance payment from a reagent company, you can withdraw it, and the details are even more varied. Hundreds of millions of dollars can go home empty-handed, let alone 10 million. It must be great in the eyes of fart people. In the current social market, in the eyes of people with resources and in the hands of academic fraud bosses, it is no different from Mao Mao Rain. It is not a day or two, a year or two, nor is it an individual phenomenon of one person, two people or three or five people, which has become a blatant hidden rule in China academic circles. Jin Chen of Shanghai Jiaotong University bought an American chip, affixed his own logo, and said that he made it himself, so that the state could allocate funds. These tutors are engaged in scientific research in China solely for funds. All they care about is money and honor, and their means are so cheap that they end up writing articles. They didn't buy any equipment and do any experiments all year round. At the end of the project, they wrote an article and cheated tens of millions and hundreds of millions, which was 10 thousand times higher than the profit of drug trafficking. As for whether it has practical value, is the data squeezed out? Who cares? It would be nice to get a lot of invoices. There are really no stupid and rich people! Many instructors call it fine-tuning, tampering with experimental data, and making fake art.

3. Cheating has low cost and no risk. Has fraud been discovered? Yes, and quite a few, but what about the treatment after the problem? Even if the article is found to have shit, what will happen to the instructors who caught the story? What are the consequences? There are no consequences. Look at what happened to China's tutor after the incident, which can be described as zero cost of crime. For example, in Han Chunyu, it has been two years, and people are still drinking, dancing and getting money. China 106 manuscripts were rejected by the authors of tumor biology. Tumor biology pulled out radish and brought it out of the mud, and the people who were withdrawn from the manuscript jumped up and down shamelessly in China academic circles. Compared with suicide by jumping off a building, China's punishment for academic fraud is too light. The leaders of Huada have also received kickbacks and spent money. Who doesn't want to keep the secret that doing more is better than doing less? After all, the buckle was withdrawn in private. Maybe the leaders drank wine and made a toast to Han Chunyu. "Brother, you have sheltered me from the wind and rain, and you have worked hard!"

The tutor repeatedly pressured the students to cheat. Students are too simple. The tutor asked the students to cheat. Can the students do it? Students can choose not to build, but the tutor will say "don't let yourself get lost". Just because a student can choose not to build it does not mean that it is not man-made. Do students dare to report it? Ask students to be witnesses. Do students dare? The tutor emphasizes a harmonious society. How dare a fart student report and testify? People who do things by themselves are all students, soldiers and shrimps in the system. How can a higher-level tutor do things by himself? Jie Qing's national evaluation has never listened to the opinions of his tutor's students, and the students have never participated in the evaluation of teachers' morality and style. Mentors get these funds and get rid of their own use, and the rest are for children to study abroad, for their wives to buy jewelry LV, and for big leaders to give gifts on holidays ... and then ... all the funds have to be paid by students themselves, and students are disgusted and don't want to be coolies anymore. No matter how bitter it is, ask the students to accompany the tiger, send snacks to the tutor who plays mahjong at 3 o'clock in the middle of the night, send breakfast to the tutor at 6 o'clock in the morning, and pick up the tutor's children after school in the afternoon ... The doctors are not here to engage in scientific research, but to do odd jobs for the tutor!

Third, the brain drain is like an army of wildebeests.

1. The name of China Scientific Research is ridiculous. In such an environment of crazy counterfeiting, holding funds and making a splash, after all, most scientific research in China is playing erhu in the crotch, which is nonsense. How much is really useful depends on whether it will be boasted. Smart chips such as mobile phones have been studied for so many years, but they just can't get out. Defeated by the United States, Huawei and ZTE almost went into shock. In this circle, there are too many false things. Tutors oppress students, make academic fraud and extract funds. Thanks to those students who worked hard, they delayed their lives and missed the future of the country. Anyone who has stayed in this circle knows what scientific research in China is like now. Therefore, even if China is the first in the world in invention patents, it is useless, just fooling laymen.

2. Foreign academic circles severely crack down on scientific research fraud. Unlike China's academic circles, which are crazy about counterfeiting and obtaining funds, European and American academic circles have a good atmosphere of maintaining industry norms, cracking down on scientific research fraud and severely punishing illegal personnel. The audit system is implemented strictly, in place and seriously. If you want to question an article, just send an email to the editor-in-chief of a foreign journal, and someone will arrange the rest. It is one of the professional obligations of foreign academic practitioners to verify the suspicious results of their major. International academic circles are very willing to make efforts to maintain industry norms. Although Europe and America can't completely eliminate cases of scientific research fraud, once fraud is found, the punishment is extremely severe, and the life of the counterfeiter is almost completely destroyed.

3. The impetuous academic circles in China can't keep talents who are really interested in scientific research. Peking University, Tsinghua University, Beihang University, Xi Jiaotong University, Xi University of Technology, Wuhan University of Technology and other universities are the key bases for China's talent export. As long as you are a master, doctor or associate doctor who has just been admitted, one foot has stepped into the door of the world's top 100 university. In recent years, many doctors have given up their domestic doctoral degrees, stayed away from domestic academic circles, defected to the world's top 100 university, and resumed their doctoral studies.

The original text comes from the official account of WeChat WeChat "The Trend of the Times"

/s/zuche 5 hqisrxdw qd 00x kmg

Thank you for your information!