1, political preliminary examination. Politically, it mainly examines eight aspects: national territory and sovereignty; National dignity; Party's principles and policies; Foreign-related issues; Religious issues; Historical issues; Confidentiality issues; Other political issues.
2. Expert review. Innovation mainly refers to the new contribution of papers to human knowledge, technology or thought.
3. Finalize. Source of analysis paper: The fund subject is strictly approved and has sufficient funds, so its paper may be more innovative. Author information analysis: The quality of new works by recognized high-level authors may be good, because the research is inherited, and the quality of papers is positively related to the quality of authors. Analysis: Papers with clear and novel topics, complete experimental process and data, sufficient typical arguments, rigorous argumentation and clear conclusions are generally innovative.
Every article was typed back for its own reasons. As an author, when receiving the opinions of reviewers, we should first straighten our minds and keep calm. This is to:
1, all questions must be answered one by one;
2. Try to satisfy the experiments that need to be supplemented in the opinions;
3. Don't avoid what you can't meet, and explain reasonable reasons for what you can't do;
4. For the opinions you disagree with, you should also answer tactfully and skillfully, so as to be well-founded;
5. Documents recommended by reviewers must be cited and discussed.