The strategy of writing good references is as follows! In fact, as long as we can avoid some common problems, we can complete a perfect reference!

1. Avoid choosing references that are out of the topic of the paper.

The selection of references must closely focus on the theme, serve the theme of expression and demonstration, and select those that can effectively explain, highlight and contrast the theme, otherwise it will be abandoned, which is a basic principle of selecting references.

Some papers often make the mistake of giving up love when using references, and write some references unrelated to the theme into the article, which affects the expression of the theme. Some papers only use the latest references unrelated to the theme of the paper to reflect the novelty of the references, which not only fails to reflect the novelty of the references, but also is redundant. ?

2. The selection of references is not typical.

The so-called typical reference refers to the most representative reference in social science, which can effectively reveal the essence of things and focus on the theme of the paper. Therefore, you can't write all the references related to the topic, so you must choose typical references. ?

For very classic references, we should also consider whether they are old or not. We should briefly summarize outdated references or well-known references, otherwise, even very classic references, too many well-known references will make our articles not novel enough.

3. The selected reference is not true enough?

The reference materials used in the paper are convincing only in real situations. The so-called truth means that the reference object really exists objectively and can reflect the original appearance of objective things. Only when the references used in the paper are true can the argument stand up and be convincing. However, some papers are inaccurate in selecting materials, fail to identify the authenticity, and fail to carefully check historical figures, events, time, place, figures, quotations, etc. , there will be an error. Such an article is unconvincing.

4. The selected references are not novel.

Writing papers and selecting references should be novel, fresh and eye-catching. This can enhance the realism of the paper and make people feel refreshed. This requires that when writing a thesis, we should pay attention to discovering new things and choosing references in this field. You can choose materials from different angles, giving people a sense of freshness. Some students will use some outdated examples, which is not only not fresh and realistic, but also unconvincing.

5. Literature citation does not meet the requirements.

The literature listed in (1) is too extensive, and all references are listed, such as textbooks, internal publications, prize-winning but unpublished achievement reports, etc.

(2) There are too many documents listed. For example, some doctors think that the more literature, the better, and include all the references after articles and books they have read. Some authors don't read it themselves, just feel that it has something to do with their own articles, so they make up for it.

(3) There are too few documents listed, and some doctors are afraid that their articles will be regarded as plagiarism because they cite too many other people's things, deliberately omitting some important references;

(4) One-sided understanding of the literature, thinking that only the original literature can be listed;

(5) If it is too big to be appropriate, take the whole issue of the publication or even several consecutive issues of the magazine or the whole newspaper as a reference.

6. The literature description does not conform to the specifications.

(1) Missing items, for example, some documents only contain the author and title, some books miss the publishing house, and some periodicals miss the year and issue number;

(2) The items are too complicated, such as the chief editor, deputy editor or even deputy editor of some books, book name, subtitle, title, etc.

(3) disorder. For example, some literature entries write titles first, some writers first, and some journals first, which are inconsistent and not as required;

(4) Numbers and punctuation are not standardized, such as chinese numerals, Arabic numerals, black dots and book titles;

(5) Not arranged according to the label. Generally, the labeled references in the text should be arranged in order, not in disorder. ?

If you need help with your thesis writing, please feel free to contact Yingcaijun!