2. Evaluation According to the comments of the dissertation, it is necessary to evaluate the papers submitted for review. The assessment is mainly based on the Regulations on Academic Degrees in People's Republic of China (PRC) (adopted at the 13th meeting of the Standing Committee of the Fifth NPC on February 1980). Because graduate degrees are divided into master's degrees and doctor's degrees, the requirements for papers are different in principle.
For the application of master's degree thesis, the main review:
(1) Master the solid basic theory and systematic professional knowledge of this discipline;
(2) have the ability to engage in scientific research or independently undertake professional and technical work.
For the application of doctoral thesis, the main review:
(1) Master the solid and extensive basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge of this discipline;
(2) Having the ability to engage in scientific research independently;
(3) making creative achievements in science or specialized technology.
3. Under the guidance of the tutor, the graduate students at the evaluation level have completed the research and writing of their dissertations, and generally need the following evaluation: (1) the evaluation of the tutor; (2) Peer expert review; (3) the defense Committee defends the defense; (4) Review by the Academic Degrees Committee. The first three links require written comments. Due to different angles and different orientations, comments are written in different ways. Especially the conclusion of the review, the author will explain it in detail later.
Generally speaking, the reviewer of master's degree thesis should be an expert with the title of associate higher vocational college or above, and generally should be a master's tutor; The reviewers of doctoral dissertations should be experts in higher vocational colleges and above, and generally should be doctoral supervisors.
Comments on graduate dissertations require accurate wording and objective evaluation. Whether it is positive or negative, it must be well-founded and convincing. A good evaluation can't add one more word, nor can it lose one word.
4. Evaluation content Generally speaking, the evaluation of dissertations includes the following aspects:
(1) The topic of the thesis mainly depends on whether it belongs to the frontier of this discipline and whether the research work has theoretical significance and practical value. In China, most of the projects listed in the National 973 Project Plan, the 863 Project, the National Natural Science Foundation and the National Key Scientific and Technological Projects are at the forefront of scientific development, because they have been demonstrated by peer experts in the process of project establishment, which is the focus or focus of peer attention.
(2) Literature review mainly depends on whether we have mastered the latest trends and progress of related research work in this discipline. Literature review has two aspects: quantity and quality. In terms of quantity, it mainly depends on whether the main documents related to this subject field are basically covered around the theme of the paper, and in terms of quality, it mainly depends on whether the representative papers and influential main documents in this subject field are summarized. For example, the literature of influential academic journals and conferences in this discipline and the works of influential scholars should be reflected in the literature review. More importantly, the dissertation review needs to be summarized by the author's literature review to see if it summarizes the overall trend, law and problems to be solved in this discipline and research direction.
(3) Main work and innovation, academic significance and value, which are the core contents of dissertation evaluation. For doctoral dissertations, the research work should be innovative and systematic. Comments should not only list, summarize and summarize the main work and innovations of the submitted review papers, but also point out their academic value.
In the writing of dissertation comments, a prominent problem is that in the reviewed graduate dissertations, the general author has summarized the main work and innovations of the dissertations, and the reviewers of the dissertations should summarize and evaluate the work and innovations of the dissertations from a higher height and a broader perspective.
(4) Thesis writing Thesis writing is an important aspect of dissertation evaluation. It mainly examines whether the writing of the paper is clear and coherent, whether the experimental data can be used, and whether the inference is scientific and correct. Through the writing of the paper, we can also see whether the author has a meticulous work style, and the orderliness and systematicness of the paper are also the embodiment of whether the research work is systematic.
(5) Problems and Suggestions Any research work, whether high-level or low-level, will inevitably have problems, which is beyond reproach and is well known. But generally speaking, for quite some time before, domestic academic circles did not dare to point out that too sharp problems would affect the overall evaluation of the paper, so they only made a positive evaluation and did not point out the problems existing in the research work. In recent years, in the evaluation of dissertations in some key universities, special columns with problems have been set up, and many experts have truthfully pointed out that they have played a very good role. In fact, objectively speaking, the relationship between the achievements and the existing problems of the paper should be analyzed in detail, and it cannot be generalized. Having many or big problems does not necessarily mean that there are no creative results or the results are of little value.
(6) The opinions and conclusions of doctoral dissertations that have passed the review shall include or imply the following contents:
A. Whether the paper reflects the author's solid and extensive basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge in this discipline;
B. Whether the research work of dissertation can reflect the author's ability to engage in scientific research independently;
C whether the research work of the paper has achieved creative results in science or special technology.
The final comment conclusion is related to the identity of the commentator. In my opinion, if you are a doctoral supervisor, the final accurate conclusion is that the thesis meets the requirements of doctoral thesis and agrees to be reviewed by peer experts. If it is a peer review expert, it is agreed (or suggested) to organize a thesis defense committee to arrange defense if the thesis submitted meets the requirements of doctoral thesis. As for the thesis defense committee, it is proposed that: by secret ballot, all the votes (X votes) passed the students' doctoral thesis defense, and agreed (or suggested) to award the doctoral degree (engineering). Or: by secret ballot of the defense committee, a unanimous vote (X votes) passed the defense of xx students' doctoral thesis, agreed to graduate, and agreed (or suggested) to award (engineering) a doctorate.
5. Example Appreciation The following is a review of a paper, which I think is an example of a review worthy of appreciation:
Covering the whole process of product design with computer-aided design technology is the main content of CAD research. Traditional CAD technology focuses on the detailed design and drawing output of auxiliary products, so it has great limitations. This paper takes graphic unit as the carrier of product design information, through motion analysis, function mapping, variant design, correlation design and so on.
Means, the computer-aided design technology is fully integrated into the product conceptual design process, and a series of creative research results have been achieved:
1. The part structure is divided into three levels: part, functional structure and gene unit, and the functional structure is used as the unit to organize the gene unit, which is beneficial to realize the functional-based conceptual design of parts.
2. The extraction method of product skeleton unit is proposed. By inserting, deleting, replacing, decomposing, integrating, cloning, deriving and other skeleton unit replacement methods, the variant design of the product is carried out under the condition of keeping the function unchanged. Different from the traditional parametric design based on size, the above-mentioned deformation design can lead to the change of product structure, thus providing an effective CAD means for innovative design. The representation of skeleton elements fully reflects the constraint relationship between the structure and other structures in the product. On the premise of ensuring the order and consistency of all structural units in the product, it reduces the extra large amount of data, which is beneficial to the repeated consideration and modification of the design scheme in conceptual design.
3. In the associative design, five kinds of associative constraint models are summarized, which provide a design basis for automatically generating export units in the detailed design stage.
4. Based on graphic element replacement and iteration technology, a modular product information modeling prototype system is constructed. On this basis, MCADDS system is developed and successfully applied to the design of punching and shearing machine tools and the traditional system design of XJD point machine.
5. The paper is rich in content, clear in organization and complete in structure, especially the application of CAD technology to assist the variant design of products and the repeated modification of design scheme during the design process. This article is an excellent doctoral thesis, and it is recommended to submit a defense.
6. Conclusion From a certain point of view, the comments on graduate dissertations not only evaluate the research work of graduate dissertations, but also reflect the comprehensive level of reviewers. It not only reflects the academic level of the reviewers, but also reflects their writing style. It belongs to a kind of professional practical writing in applied writing, which is worth our study.
The topic is novel, closely combined with clinical practice, and the design is reasonable, which belongs to the research hotspot of this discipline and has certain theoretical significance and practical value. The content of the paper is basically consistent with the topic, with complete structure, standardized format, clear hierarchy, clear organization, fluent language and rich content. The collected literature is rich and detailed, basically covering the main literature related to this discipline, which has a certain inductive effect on the development trend of this discipline. Sufficient data, rigorous discussion process, clear thinking, comprehensive application of learned knowledge to solve problems, proper selection of analysis methods, and credible results. The paper is carefully written, the reasoning is logical, and the conclusions and suggestions are of practical significance. It is a master's thesis with high academic value.
This paper embodies the author's solid theoretical foundation, systematic professional knowledge and good scientific research ability in this subject. It meets the requirements of master's degree thesis, and it is suggested to arrange a defense.
Xxx's bachelor's degree thesis "Analysis of Movie Editing of Revolutionary Model Opera" is a unique topic to study the editing skills of Chinese revolutionary model opera movies during the Cultural Revolution. For a long time, the research in this field is basically blank, so this topic is valuable. Model opera movies, which originated from revolutionary model operas on the stage, are works of art created by a large number of artists and tested by the audience. After filming, it not only kept the original appearance of the model operas, but also made some artistic innovations. Due to the special historical events at that time, on the one hand, it restricted artistic creation, on the other hand, it was possible to concentrate the best domestic film artists to shoot revolutionary model operas, which formed its artistic characteristics. The biggest feature of the revolutionary model drama film is to realize the high combination of drama art and film art, and create a brand-new hypothesis. That is, it is not a film creation based on the original model opera, nor is it a simple stage art film. In the creation of revolutionary model operas, various experiences of China films in this respect were summarized and popularized, and a new style was formed. The editing skills of such films are especially the parts that are easily overlooked. In fact, in the revolutionary model operas, editing techniques are used quite smoothly and richly. Wang Ying's paper studies the different splicing skills of model operas such as movies, literary dramas and martial arts dramas, and then deeply analyzes the splicing skills of singing, dialogue, atmosphere, action layout and martial arts, which is quite rewarding. The main body of this paper is clear, the layout is reasonable, the explanation is simple and the details are appropriate. The author's professional level and writing attitude are worthy of recognition. It is a pity that there is still a lack of understanding of some issues due to the specific era in which the author's principles are located. But as a young student, it is commendable to dare to challenge such a difficult topic and play a role in filling the gap. This is an excellent paper.