After the thesis defense, although it means that the in-depth research and accurate expression of the thesis have been completed, it does not mean that the quality of this thesis can meet the requirements of all experts, and it is likely that it needs to be revised to further improve the quality.

When defending, experts may point out some unclear or wrong sentences in the paper, which need to be revised in time and expressed in simpler, more accurate and more vivid language. If the language in the paper is vague and difficult to understand, it will bring unnecessary burden to readers, and then affect the evaluation of the paper.

In the defense, the members of the jury may put forward some suggestions for improvement, which can involve all aspects of the paper, such as content, discussion methods, charts, quotations and so on. According to this suggestion, we need to consider how to modify it to enhance the readability and coherence of the paper.

In the paper review, experts may think that the paper lacks some empirical evidence or arguments, and suggest adding some (such as charts, data, examples, etc.). ) to fill these shortcomings, thus strengthening the discussion logic and empirical basis of the paper.

In the process of defense, the members of the jury can put forward specific suggestions on the quality of the paper advocated by the reviewers, so that the researchers can re-examine the value and conclusion of the paper under the guidance of experts and constantly improve, perfect and develop the content of the paper.

Defense can help researchers learn to cope with academic modesty and criticism, especially when raising professional and critical questions, which requires researchers to express clearly and answer clearly, and support the innovation, reliability and scientificity of their own thoughts. In this way, the author's thinking ability, eloquence and academic attainments will be improved.

In a word, after the thesis defense, the improvement and conception of the original thesis may need to be adjusted in detail. In order to optimize the quality of the paper and make it meet the requirements of experts and reviewers, the revision of the paper is an indispensable and important work. Attention should be paid to accuracy, scientificity and standardization to achieve the integrity and excellent level of the paper.

Promoting academic thinking and improving the quality of papers

In the process of defense, the members of the jury can put forward specific suggestions on the quality of the paper advocated by the reviewers, so that the researchers can re-examine the value and conclusion of the paper under the guidance of experts and constantly improve, perfect and develop the content of the paper.