(1) Grasp the overall situation

The following five points must be done when students reply:

1, release the report

Step 2 focus on the key points

Step 3 seize interest

4, grasp the time

Step 5 leave a foreshadowing

(2) Preparation of opening remarks

Say hello to the expert at the beginning of the defense. Preface is the official beginning of the whole thesis defense, which can attract attention, establish credibility and predict the intention and main content of the defense. A good beginning is half the battle. It should be related to the theme, the tone of defense and the use of appropriate language. Negative beginnings should be avoided, such as self-defense (for example, "I'm under too much pressure to find a job recently, and I haven't been fully prepared ..." "I'm too busy with my work and I'm not fully prepared ..."), which not only shows respect for the experts of the defense committee, but also shows a lack of personal confidence, and the respondent's first impression of the experts is greatly reduced. Remember that modesty and prudence are the traditional virtues of our country, but modesty is not self-confidence. At the same time, we should avoid self-expression, complacency and seek appreciation. Excessive performance will arouse the disgust of experts from the National Defense Commission. (For example, "After so many years of thinking, I feel that my system design has reached the most scientific and perfect point ...")

(3) report papers

Attention should be paid to: grasp the time, briefly introduce, be calm and calm, have a beautiful voice, use Mandarin, cadence, rich expressions, express incisively and vividly, use positive language in tone, that is, yes or no, and don't be ambiguous. The content is closely related to the theme, the expression is clear and smooth, the voice is loud and infectious, and the appropriate gestures are used to achieve the best defense effect. Most of the students who attended the defense meeting spoke at a relatively low volume, so it is estimated that only the people in the first two rows can hear clearly. Voice has three advantages: first, it strengthens courage and reduces stage fright; The second is to attract teachers' attention; Third, it will make them more passionate and infect teachers. Of course, fluency and persuasiveness of language can't be built in a day. It depends on improvisation.

(4) How to answer questions raised by experts of the defense committee.

After the ruczy report of the NPC's on-the-spot investigation, experts from the National Defense Commission will each ask two to four questions. When recording questions, pay attention to whether you understand them correctly. Some experts have low voices (such as Professor Xu of Chongqing University). When you can't hear clearly, you must ask, "Mr. Ru, what do you mean?" . It is very troublesome to understand the wrong questions, which leads to passiveness in answering them. Our school allows 20 minutes of preparation time. It is appropriate to ask questions from experts. Listen patiently and don't interrupt others' questions casually. Answer the questions raised by experts completely, and don't show pride when you feel good about yourself. If you really don't know how to answer, just explain it directly to the experts and don't answer irrelevant questions. Don't argue irrationally about questions you are not sure about. Seeking truth from facts means that you haven't made it clear, so you must study this problem seriously in the future. In short, the defense should be practical and realistic, neither humble nor humble, polite, and always show respect and gratitude to the experts. Note that the defense is not a purely academic defense, and non-academic components account for about half. You should show your maturity in all aspects and prove that you have the ability of academic research.

Sometimes the teacher of the defense committee is not satisfied with the answer given by the respondent, and will ask further questions to find out whether the author really understands and grasps this question. In this case, if the respondent is sure to make it clear, he can state the reasons for his defense; If you are not sure, you can try to answer carefully and answer as much as you can, even if it is not exact, it doesn't matter. As long as it is related to the question, the teacher will guide and inspire you to get to the point; If it's really a problem you haven't figured out, you should be realistic and explain that you haven't figured it out, and say that you must study this problem carefully in the future, and you can't argue irrationally and quibble. Because the teacher of the defense Committee may have studied this problem specially, no matter how clever he is, he can't fool him. It should be understood here that it is not surprising that a student was asked a question at the defense meeting, because the members of the defense Committee are generally experts in this field. It is natural that they can't answer one of their questions. Of course, not all questions can be answered, and it is not normal to ask three questions without knowing.

In the defense, sometimes the main defense teacher will put forward a point of view different from the basic point of view in your paper, and then please talk about your point of view. At this time, you should try your best to defend your point of view and refute the opposite point of view. Among the questions asked by the main defense teacher, there are some basic knowledge questions and some academic inquiry questions. For the former question, it is not negotiable to ask you to give a correct and comprehensive answer. The latter question is still inconclusive, and people with different views can discuss it with each other. If the basic ideas of your thesis are well thought out and justified, don't give up your own ideas just because the members of the defense Committee put forward different opinions. Otherwise, it is tantamount to denying your hard-earned paper. You know, some defense teachers put forward different views from your paper, not his own. He just wants to hear your comments and opinions on this point of view, or to test your defense ability, or your firmness in your own point of view. To say the least, even if you ask the teacher your own opinion, you should argue with him with the attitude of "I love the teacher and I love the truth more". But when arguing with the defense teacher, we should pay attention to the discretion and use appropriate arguments. Generally speaking, we should give priority to defending our own views, refute each other's arguments in euphemistic language as much as possible, and input our views into each other in a questioning tone without showing any trace, so as to convince them orally or secretly. Let the teacher who asked questions feel that although he accepted your opinion, his self-esteem was not hurt.

(v) Concluding remarks and thanks

Be sure to thank you before the report ends. After the thesis defense, the author should listen carefully to the judgment of the defense Committee, further analyze and think about the opinions put forward by the defense teacher, and summarize the experience and lessons of thesis writing. On the one hand, through this graduation thesis writing, I want to know what scientific research methods I have learned and mastered, and my ability to ask questions, analyze, solve problems and conduct scientific research has been improved. What are the shortcomings, as a reference for studying other topics in the future. On the other hand, we should seriously think about the questions and opinions raised by the defense teachers at the thesis defense meeting, revise our own papers, deepen our research, and seriously revise our own papers to achieve in-depth development and achieve greater results. To improve their knowledge and ability.

I hope my relatives will adopt ~