1. academic quality: this is the most basic standard, including the innovation, scientificity and rigor of research. Whether the research has novel ideas or findings, whether it is based on scientific theories and methods, whether the data collection and analysis are rigorous, and whether the conclusions are reasonable.
2. Writing quality: including whether the structure of the paper is clear, whether the language is accurate and whether the quotation is standardized. Whether the paper has a clear introduction, methods, results and discussion parts, whether the language is clear and easy to understand, whether the cited documents are accurate, and whether it conforms to the citation format of the journal.
3. Meet the requirements of journals: each journal has its own submission requirements, including the length, format and number of references of papers. Whether the paper meets these requirements is also a factor that reviewers will consider.
4. Originality: the content of the paper shall not be copied from other people's research results, otherwise it will be rejected directly. Even if it is a review or summary of other people's research, it needs to have its own unique views and analysis.
5. Repeatability: The research methods and results of the paper should be detailed enough for other researchers to repeat experiments or research. If the method or result of the paper is not clear, it may affect its repeatability.
6. Contribution to society or science: Whether the research of the paper has practical application value or what contribution it has made to the development of scientific theory is also a factor that reviewers will consider.
The above are some basic standards for blind review of journal papers, but the specific standards may vary from journal to journal.