Writing Tip: The main content of the material is the story that Confucius praised the students for receiving valuable reward gifts after being brave, and criticized the students for not going to the official government for reimbursement after redeeming slaves. The two students in the material are only the objects of discussion, and the material mainly expresses Confucius' views on these two things rather than focusing on the behavior of these two students. Therefore, the main object of the material is Confucius. The angle of choice should be Confucius' evaluation of these two things. Grasping the key is to grasp the key sentences of Confucius' evaluation of these two things. Confucius agreed that as long as you save people in distress, no matter how big the reward is, you can accept it with peace of mind, because it can encourage more people to save lives. Confucius opposed the students' self-repayment after they redeemed slaves. Because if people use money to redeem slaves, they will suffer if they don't pay, but paying money means that students with less personality than Confucius have to pretend not to see them in the future. Distinguishing right from wrong is to find out whether Confucius praised students for accepting rewards or criticized them for reimbursing themselves. Analyze the reasons: Why do others criticize students and Confucius praise them? Why did Confucius get angry when others praised his students for their high morality? What's the connection between these two things? The above analysis can confirm the following ideas: 1. Good deeds should be rewarded, and those who do good deeds should not suffer. 2. Unity of morality and interests. 3. Comply with justice and pursue wealth. 4. Look at interests and morality rationally. 5. Interests and morality should pursue the maximization of social value. It feels good to have an elite teacher to support and answer your questions.