"Rational taste" of "meaningful words"

The rigidity, profundity and criticism of developing thinking

State your views in a responsible manner.

Language divorced from thinking

To be "expressive", an argumentative essay should embody three elements: argument, argument and argumentation. Only the "topic", rambling around the "topic", did not form their own views, let alone consciously use factual arguments and rational arguments to demonstrate their views. Without the "body", thinking becomes fragmented and even chaotic.

"Words with substance" is full of fancy words, but there is no conclusive argument. The "meaningful words" of the paper should at least be solid and effective arguments with sufficient arguments to support the point of view, which is the "seeking truth and being pragmatic" in writing attitude.

It is a strict requirement of rational analysis to accumulate historical and realistic materials instead of making a fuss about the stories of Conan the Little Detective and Harry Potter. Fictional characters and plots may reflect certain social phenomena, but after all, they are fictional and unfounded.

"Reasonable" is reflected in the analysis of arguments, which is also a reflection of thinking ability. What is needed to analyze truth in practice is logic and speculation.

An orderly speech is reflected in the local language, the logic of the language, the overall situation of the article, the idea of planning the layout of the article and the embodiment of logical thinking.

The article is well organized and the argument is powerful and orderly, which makes people clearly grasp the author's views and ideas.

The article presents the characteristics of in-depth thinking layer by layer, and each part constitutes progressive meaning and logic, approaching the core of the problem like bamboo shoots, asking questions, analyzing problems, and then solving problems.

Mastering the law of thinking analysis and logical elaboration, the article may be very profound. The chaos that middle school students often make now is manifested in the disorderly superposition of materials related to the topic.

"Words with words" should be the most suitable form for the content of the article.

The "innovation" you mentioned is the "creativity" repeatedly emphasized in the new curriculum standard, which encourages students to innovate in their usual compositions and be "original" after tempering. Thought is really original, and it is a kind of "don't spit" that wants to compete with others. "Innovation" is a process of "thinking-learning-rethinking", not a whim. This training process can also cultivate students' spirit of pursuing true knowledge, which is the unique function of argumentative training.

"What you say is new" is not only a new viewpoint, but also a fresh language expression and a fresh argument. It is also an innovation to encourage students to pay attention to the real society, accumulate material from news, or find a new angle when reviewing old things and express it in unconventional language.