As can be seen from the above definition, the necessary condition for effective publication is that the published papers have original or innovative contents, and there must be enough scientific information for peers to repeat, test or evaluate. This is because only original or innovative content can be called real scientific and technological achievements, attract the attention of peers and be worthy of peer inspection or evaluation; At the same time, only with enough scientific information, so that colleagues can repeat, test or evaluate, can we confirm its scientificity, reliability and scientific value. Under this necessary condition, the sufficient condition is that the publications published for the first time can be paid attention to by professional peers and easily obtained, which is convenient for academic exchanges with real professional peers. On the contrary, publications that lack innovation or claim innovation but cannot be repeated and tested by peers, as well as publications that are repeatedly published or are not concerned by professional peers, are invalid publications.
As we all know, scientific and technical personnel should publish a certain number of academic papers when evaluating performance, rewarding achievements, evaluating professional titles or applying for degrees, and the quality level of the papers should be determined. It is reasonable to pursue academic innovation and publish high-level and valuable scientific papers in order to gain recognition from academia and society, and then gain corresponding academic status. However, publishing papers should not only be for project conclusion and performance evaluation, but also for evaluating professional titles, obtaining degrees and competing for projects. In the minds of some scholars, publishing a paper means getting a professional title, degree, honor, bonus or fund. These so-called scholars don't talk about the effectiveness of publishing, and their concept of effective publishing is distorted. What they care about is whether publishing papers in journals of what grade and name is effective for degree application, professional title evaluation, project declaration or bonus distribution.
The effective publication of papers depends on the motivation and behavior of publication. Publishing motivation, publishing behavior and publishing effect are closely related. The basic motivation and goal of publishing papers should be to report innovative scientific research achievements and unique academic viewpoints and opinions, strive for academic recognition, exchange ideas with peers, or accept peer inquiries for further revision and improvement, or promote the transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements. Authors, editors, reviewers and scientific research managers should establish correct awareness of papers, strengthen awareness of innovation, scientific discovery and invention priority, academic communication, quality and responsibility, and correspondingly dilute utilitarian awareness, and avoid mercenary and unscrupulous means.
Only responsible publishing can become effective publishing. Both the author of the paper and the editor of the journal should pay attention to the comprehensive benefits of the publication of the paper, and regard the research results with innovative content and academic exchange application value as the only appeal of publication; We should be cautious and responsible for publishing papers, strictly abide by academic norms in scientific research, writing, submission, review and even publication, and strive to publish papers that can convey new scientific and technological information to peers, trigger academic exchanges and promote the transformation and application of achievements, so as to achieve positive academic and social effects.