Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - In the history of mankind, which is more harmful to ordinary people, a bad king or a tyrant?
In the history of mankind, which is more harmful to ordinary people, a bad king or a tyrant?
A bad king does a lot of harm.

A bad king refers to an incompetent monarch. This kind of monarch is easy to listen to his cronies, and will not consider the influence of things, which will directly lead to the dereliction of duty of his officials, thus making it impossible for the people to confront the nobles. In this case, a small number of people will benefit! This is the key. If it were you, what would you think if you saw evil people continue to enjoy themselves but were unable to protect their families and interests? This is magic damage, and there are additional damage blessings. If you are a tyrant, you have your own ideas and are strong. Your subordinates are not as crazy as before, everyone dies together, killing one piece at a time ... will you still have such a strong sense of gain and loss as before? Physical injury, physical attack. At least I don't feel so bad.

Authors: Chen Taiqiu, Zhou Youqi

Link:/question/27606555/answer/37317005

Source: Zhihu.

The copyright belongs to the author. Please contact the author for authorization for commercial reprinting, and please indicate the source for non-commercial reprinting.