This is a famous article describing a war in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. It mainly shows Cao Gui's "foresight" and revolves around "controversy". The full text uses only 222 words to clearly describe the beginning, development, climax and ending of the war. The theme of the article is clear, the structure is compact, it is discussed while recording, there is truth and falsehood, and the front and back care complement each other, highlighting "winning the trust of the people", which is a model of the paper. However, you will watch the doorway, but you will not watch the excitement. Someone asked, "If a common people can talk, can they see the emperor?" "Can the emperor listen to the people and report to them?" "How can an ordinary Cao Gui man command a war?" Wait a minute. However, this is the case. So from a deeper level, the state of Lu at that time was very people-oriented, or at least Duke Zhuang of Lu was people-oriented. He sympathizes with officials and people, respects God and talents. He is not afraid of being strong and dares to fight, and he knows it well. It's just that Cao Gui is arrogant and thinks that "carnivores are frivolous and can't have foresight." As a historical work in the Spring and Autumn Period, I think the main idea of this article should not be to say that Cao Gui is resourceful on the surface, but that he is sympathetic to people's feelings and knows people well. In fact, judging from the text, the reasons for showing Luzhuang people's democracy are sufficient, while the reasons for showing Cao Gui's strategy are very superficial. "Husband, courage also. High spirits, then decline, three exhausted. I am exhausted and profitable, so I will beat it, and my husband will be a big country, which is unpredictable and terrible. I regard it as chaos and look at its flag, so I chase it. " This is just general combat common sense, not strategy! Cao Gui is just a role chosen in this paper to show the people's needs-Lord Lu Zhuang. The will of the people is the guarantee of victory, and people-oriented and loving the people is the foundation of victory. In the article "Debate on Cao Gui", from the perspective of structural arrangement and characterization, the author Zuo Qiuming refers to praising the monarch's thought of "appointing people on merit" and "courageously appointing people on merit" through the Seven Laws. At the same time, it positively describes Cao Gui's "political talent" and "sergeant talent". However, in the teacher's teaching and related teaching reference books, only Cao Gui's "conspiracy" was praised, and Zhuang Gong's thoughts were not mentioned at all. On the other hand, if you despise him, he will be dwarfed. I think this goes against the author's creative intention, and the evaluation of Zhuang Gong is one-sided. I think what is really commendable is Lu Zhuanggong's character. Due to Cao Gui's lack of persuasion and truth, his "farsightedness" was brought into play and achieved success, which was all due to Zhuang Gong. As far as the interpretation of the article is concerned, it must not be ruled out that Zhuang Gong strongly supports this factor, that is to say, Zhuang Gong's "meritocracy" is a necessary prerequisite for the success of the spoon. We might as well analyze the following full text and see what Zhuang Gong did: "You will go to war, please see Cao Gui." What an unimaginable thing it is. As the king of a country, he can also take care of the visit of "grass people" and meet them in person under strong pressure and nervous preparation! More importantly, when Cao Gui rejected his strategic plan one by one, Zhuang Gong didn't get angry, but went on with more humility. When Cao Gui asked for "please follow the war", Zhuang Gong "took advantage of it". Cao Gui's enthusiasm for serving the country could not have been realized so smoothly without Zhuang Gong's "Naxian". It can be seen that Zhuang Gong's "Na Sheng" created conditions for Cao Gui to display his "foresight". Zhuang Gong's military ability is not as good as Cao Gui's. Perhaps his ability to govern the country is better than Cao Gui's. You see: "If the clothes are safe, if you dare to specialize, you will be divided"; "If you sacrifice jade and silk, if you dare to add it, you will believe it." Although this is obviously not enough as far as the conditions for participating in the war are concerned, it can be seen that Zhuang Gong is politically clear. In other words, he is not greedy, not decadent, can be honest with others, can conform to the trend, although superstitious, but after all, in that ignorant era, how can we be too demanding? Of course, there is no need to say that "small prisons, although unobservable, must be treated with affection." Moreover, "in the spring of ten years, the Qi division attacked me and the public will fight", which is often ignored by commentators. In fact, from now on, we can see that the king of this weak country has a mighty and unyielding temperament. To sum up, through these profound statements, we can see the author's praise for Zhuang Gong. I think the author wrote Cao Gui's "Vision" with the purpose of praising the monarch of Zhuang Gong. In any case, when analyzing an article, we should focus on the overall situation and don't take it out of context. Otherwise, it is "picking up sesame seeds and losing watermelon", misjudging the characters in the article, transplanting the essence of the article, and violating the author's original intention. If someone says, "Our previous analysis is absolutely correct." Then I deeply regretted it and advised the teacher to take a closer look at Lu Zhuanggong.