Titles play an important role in highlighting the theme of papers, expressing ideological content and attracting readers' attention. The title should be accurate, concise and reasonable in structure, generally no more than 20 Chinese characters.
According to GB/T 77 13— 1987, the title should avoid using uncommon abbreviations, acronyms, characters, codes and formulas. In order to facilitate international scientific and cultural exchanges, there should be English book titles. Generally, English titles should not exceed 65,438+00 content words, but should have the same meaning as Chinese titles.
2. What are the characteristics of academic papers?
The so-called knowledge refers to more professional and systematic knowledge. Academic papers are the carriers of academic achievements, and their contents are the achievements of the author's painstaking research on a certain subject in a certain scientific field, which are systematic and professional, rather than a little gain. Academics can be embodied in overthrowing some old views in a certain degree field and putting forward new opinions;
It can be to systematize the scattered materials, demonstrate them with new ideas or methods, and draw new conclusions;
You can also make new discoveries, inventions or creations through your own observation, investigation and experiments on a certain subject.
2. Theoretical
Academic papers should have certain theoretical value, prompt the essence of things and reflect objective laws. In writing, the author must use a lot of reliable materials and scientific methods to analyze the essence of things and explore the regularity. This requires the author not only to have a comprehensive understanding of the research object, but also to demonstrate, explain,
Raise your own discovery and understanding to the height of theory.
example
: the influence of network on interpersonal communication
science
The scientificity of academic papers mainly means that the author can use scientific thinking methods to conduct papers and draw scientific conclusions. It requires the author to treat the research work with a scientific attitude and method of dialectical materialism and historical materialism, respect the objective reality and persist in seeking truth from facts. Science is the soul of academic papers, and "academic papers" without science are lifeless.
3. Who are the original publishers of academic papers? Chen hongmao
I. Characteristics of academic papers 1. Academics The so-called academics refer to more professional and systematic knowledge. Academic papers are the carriers of academic achievements, and their contents are the achievements of the author's painstaking research on a certain subject in a certain scientific field, which are systematic and professional, rather than a little gain. Academics can be embodied in overthrowing some old views in a certain degree field and putting forward new opinions; It can be to systematize the scattered materials, demonstrate them with new ideas or methods, and draw new conclusions; You can also make new discoveries, inventions or creations through your own observation, investigation and experiments on a certain subject. 2. Theoretical academic papers should have certain theoretical value, prompt the essence of things and reflect objective laws. In writing, the author must use a lot of reliable materials and scientific methods to analyze the essence of things and explore the regularity. This requires the author not only to have a comprehensive understanding of the research object, but also to raise his discovery and understanding to a theoretical level through argumentation and elaboration. For example: the influence of network on interpersonal communication 3. The scientificity of scientific academic papers mainly means that the author can use scientific thinking methods to conduct papers and draw scientific conclusions. It requires the author to treat the research work with the scientific attitude and method of dialectical materialism and historical materialism, respect the objective reality and persist in seeking truth from facts. Science is the soul of academic papers, and "academic papers" without science are lifeless. Second, the basic characteristics of academic papers? 1. Academic. Academic papers with theoretical value should do the following: put forward new ideas. Put forward educational viewpoints that have not been put forward by predecessors; ? (2) to supplement or perfect a theory. Through my own thinking and exploration in teaching practice
4. What are the following characteristics of a good thesis title? Concise, accurate, clear and focused. It seems that how to draw up the topic has not attracted enough attention, and even been excluded from the training content, which has damaged the character of students' college entrance examination composition to a certain extent and adversely affected their overall writing ability.
Generally speaking, the following two situations are very regrettable: first, the article is acceptable and the title is lame; Second, the lack of the necessary sense of style, neither donkey nor horse nor fish. The reason for saying "pity" is that both of these situations can be changed through special training, but we are often used to reviewing systems based on ready-made materials and boring experience, rather than looking for new teaching content through effective and vivid information feedback.
Let's take a look at the writing questions in the 20 15 mock exam for senior three in this city, and talk about the value of the questions and the standards of the proposed questions in the context of the choice of argumentative writing style. 22. Read the following materials and write as required.
(60 points) The word "Na" has two completely opposite meanings in Modern Chinese Dictionary: it has the meaning of "accepting", such as accepting; It also means "delivery", such as paying taxes. What are your experiences and feelings about this? Please choose your own angle, write your own topic, and write a narrative or argumentative essay of at least 800 words.
As we all know, topic writing is a general requirement of new material composition and a concentrated expression of students' writing ability. A good argumentative topic not only points out the direction of writing, but also standardizes the basic content of writing; It not only has the function of outlining, but also has the function of making the finishing point.
Because of this, smart reviewers can often make a rough judgment on the merits of an article through its title. The above materials show a dialectics and a world outlook through the two opposite and complementary meanings of the word "Na", that is, completely opposite things often have identity, mutual exclusion and interdependence, or parallelism, or goal consistency.
Of course, the placement of materials is not only in the sense of "acceptance", but also in this way, students can expand their associations and express their "experiences and feelings" from the outside to the inside. Then, take and give, give and get, new and old, good and bad, advance and retreat, attack and defend, strong and weak, high and weak.
Torrid, a French social psychologist, once pointed out that the test of a person's intelligence is whether he can accommodate two opposite thoughts at the same time without interfering with his behavior. This is the famous "Torrid Theorem".
It should be said that this question leads to such a relative concept, dialectical thinking and harmonious wisdom. There is no doubt that it is appropriate to carry out speculative inquiry in one group of relationships or multiple groups of relationships; If you only start from a certain side or angle, it will only meet the meaning of the question at most.
This difference in examination concept can also be roughly seen from the title. For example, "fortunes depend on each other in times of peace", "retrogression is progress", "giving is another name for harvest", "no one takes it for granted", "counting the shadow of the sun is the most common impermanence", "why don't you spit out new branches when you don't accept the wind and rain" and "the breeze will know that flowers bloom more brightly"
Most of these titles are relational, without exception, they are "argumentative titles" rather than "topic titles", which are straightforward, clean and vivid, and naturally more expressive and attractive to argumentative papers in the examination room. But if you look at the problem dialectically, you should go out. The lost achievements, the two opposites of the same thing, positive and negative dependence, gain and loss, and a comprehensive view of the problem have all come back. Living in contradiction, a blessing in disguise is a blessing in disguise, the opposite is harmonious, and the angle takes into account both sides of things.
As for "different people have different opinions", "in the age of science and technology, there are joys and sorrows", "those who can take the exam should be open-minded", "can afford it, can let it go", "adjust measures to local conditions", "two sides", "suffering is a double-edged sword", "as you sow, you reap what you sow", and you have a good eye for pearls. Just from the topic, you either misunderstood the connotation of the material, or simply started a new stove and talked to yourself, or it was mysterious and unreasonable, or it was rude and vulgar at will. From the classification and explanation of the above composition topics, it is not difficult to understand how the topic affects the taste of the article and determines the direction of the article, and it is not difficult to infer how it affects the psychology of marking.
The topic is important, needless to say, every word is fateful and must not be sloppy. Of course, we can also sum up the general characteristics of good argumentative questions: first, concise and clear.
Ambiguous, indifferent, thoughtful, straightforward, clear at a glance, the topic is argument, often aphorism. This title is more suitable for moderate argumentative writing in article learning.
Second, it is novel and unique. Titles should be unfamiliar, vivid, eye-catching, unique and fascinating, and often combined with rhetorical devices such as metaphor, contrast, pun, quotation, parody and rhetorical question.
This title is more suitable for miscellaneous feelings, comments and argumentations. The title is the "eyes" of the article. So in our writing training, we might as well divide the content into more details. How to plan questions, including the principles and skills of planning questions, including the appreciation of good questions and the transformation and upgrading of poor questions, must enter the teachers' review vision.
5. How to analyze the writing characteristics of the article The title of the article is the eye of the article and an important part of an article. A good title can reveal the theme of the article, make people think deeply and guide readers to understand the theme. A good title is clear and attractive, which can give people freshness and deep impression and make people have a strong desire to read. Analyze the writing characteristics of the article. First of all, we should pay attention to the form and function of article titles. Second, analyze the plot of the article. The plot of the article is very important. If the theme of the article is compared to "soul", then the plot is "flesh and blood". Only when there is flesh and blood can the article have vitality. To analyze the integrity of the plot of an article, as far as common narration is concerned, it depends on whether the time, place, characters, causes, process and results of the event are grasped. It depends on whether the article explains substantive things or abstract things, so that people can understand the image, nature, function, relationship or concept, characteristics, source, evolution, similarities and differences of things. If it is an argumentative essay, it depends on whether it has three elements: argument, argument and argument. Whether the argument is clear, conclusive and logical. Third. It is required that the materials be arranged reasonably, so as to be coherent and distinct, mainly in the narrative order of the article. 1, time series narrative, that is, the sequence of narrative time and the sequence of events. 2. Flashback, that is, write the results or prominent fragments of the event first, and then describe the occurrence and development of the event in chronological order. 3, interpolation, in the process of describing the central event. Good ending, memorable. Cut to the chase, straightforward; The ending is natural, crisp and neat; Ask questions to attract readers; Summarize the full text and point out the theme; Explain the situation and introduce the background; Take care of the beginning and leave a aftertaste; Describe the environment and draw characters; Writing lyrical scenery is thought-provoking; Fifth, analyze the expression of the article. The expression of the article mainly depends on whether it is written in narrative, descriptive, discussion and lyric. Narrative is a process that directly expresses the experience of characters or the development and change of things. Description is a vivid description and depiction of people, events and environment, so that it can be reproduced in front of us in a tangible, audio and visual way. Thereby enhancing the vividness and appeal of the article. Description is often used in combination with narration. Writing articles about characters pays great attention to the description of characters' language, movements and psychology, as well as the description of the surrounding environment. Lyricism means that the author expresses his love and hate, likes and dislikes for the characters and events he writes. Argumentation is reasoning, and the author often infers through materials and logic. Explain one's point of view and show one's opinion for or against it. These four expressions are often used synthetically in articles. When analyzing the writing characteristics of articles, we should also pay attention to many other aspects, such as paragraphs and levels, transition and rhetoric, punctuation and so on. Every article has its own characteristics. Only by careful analysis and taste can we understand the article more thoroughly.
6. What are the characteristics of a good academic paper? Taking medical academic papers as an example, a good medical paper has the following characteristics:
The birth of a good medical SCI paper requires not only good topic selection and design, but also concrete implementation and serious summary. The author must grasp every link, be serious, rigorous and rigorous. Some people want to write a paper temporarily, but usually there is no title, no design, no material, let alone accumulation. How can they write papers temporarily? Therefore, medical SCI paper writing must pay attention to accumulation!
According to the source of medical papers:
It can be divided into original works (including papers, works and short reports) and compiled works (including textbooks, reference books, monographs, documents, reviews, lectures, special written talks, special discussions, etc. );
According to the purpose of writing a paper, it is divided into two categories: academic papers and degree papers;
According to the nature of medical disciplines and disciplines, it is divided into four categories: basic medicine, clinical medicine, preventive medicine and rehabilitation medicine;
According to the research content of the paper, it is divided into five categories: experimental research papers, investigation research papers, experimental research papers, data analysis papers and experience papers;
According to the genre of the paper, it is divided into: papers, documents, reviews, lectures, techniques and methods, case reports and medical popular science papers. Therefore, the author must choose the expression form of the corresponding genre according to his own research work and the content of research materials.
Every experiment or clinical observation should have strict plans and steps. Strictly operate and related procedures in the application, and do not arbitrarily change your own scientific research design and demonstration. Experts often see that many authors often use, possibly, roughly, estimate, or say that the data has obvious curative effect without statistics when writing articles. These words are not rigorous.
Provide Charlesworth's paper polishing.
If in doubt, please add WeChat official account: lunwen64.
I hope this helps.
7. What are the characteristics of academic papers? What are the minimum 0.27 yuan for library opening members? View the full content >; Original publisher: Chen Hongmao 1. Characteristics of academic papers 1. The so-called scholarship refers to more professional and systematic knowledge, and academic papers are the carriers of academic achievements. The content is that the author conducted a research on a certain subject in a certain scientific field, 32313133532363130323136353333e4b893e5b19e313333366.
Academics can be embodied in overthrowing some old views in a certain degree field and putting forward new opinions; It can be to systematize the scattered materials, demonstrate them with new ideas or methods, and draw new conclusions; You can also make new discoveries, inventions or creations through your own observation, investigation and experiments on a certain subject. 2. Theoretical academic papers should have certain theoretical value, prompt the essence of things and reflect objective laws.
In writing, the author must use a lot of reliable materials and scientific methods to analyze the essence of things and explore the regularity. This requires the author not only to have a comprehensive understanding of the research object, but also to raise his discovery and understanding to a theoretical level through argumentation and elaboration.
For example: the influence of network on interpersonal communication 3. The scientificity of scientific academic papers mainly means that the author can use scientific thinking methods to conduct papers and draw scientific conclusions. It requires the author to treat the research work with a scientific attitude and method of dialectical materialism and historical materialism, respect the objective reality and persist in seeking truth from facts.
Science is the soul of academic papers, and "academic papers" without science are lifeless. Second, the basic characteristics of academic papers? 1. Academic.
Academic papers with theoretical value should do the following: put forward new ideas. Put forward educational viewpoints that have not been put forward by predecessors; ? (2) to supplement or perfect a theory.
Through my own thinking and exploration in teaching practice.
8. What are the basic characteristics of an academic paper? Academic papers are the innovative records of scientific research achievements and the basic units of human knowledge treasure house.
Academic papers should have the following four characteristics: first, they are scientific. The scientific nature of academic papers requires that authors should not be biased because of personal likes and dislikes, and should not make subjective assumptions. He must proceed from objective reality and draw practical conclusions.
In terms of arguments, we should grasp as much information as possible and take the most sufficient and conclusive arguments as the basis of arguments. When demonstrating, we must go through careful thinking and conduct rigorous argumentation.
Objectivity of content: the content of the paper must be objective facts, that is, it requires the scientific content to be true, mature, feasible and repeatable. Comprehensiveness of expression: the scientific content of the paper must be expressed in language, words or pictures, and the words should be concise, clear and comprehensive.
Logic of structure: The scientific content expressed in the structure of the article must conform to the laws of thinking such as logical reasoning, argumentation and refutation, and be logical. Standardization of format: the format of paper writing has been gradually standardized, and its rules must be strictly observed.
Second, creativity. Scientific research is the exploration of new knowledge.
Innovation is the life of scientific research. The creativity of academic papers lies in that the author should have his own unique viewpoints and be able to put forward new viewpoints and theories.
Therefore, without creativity, academic papers have no scientific value. Creativity is the fundamental criterion to measure the value of academic papers.
Great creativity and high paper value; On the contrary, the paper is of low value. The so-called creativity here refers to the new theory, new method, new technology or creative imitation that the world has not talked about in the paper.
An article without originality may have certain social and economic value, but it is useless to the development of science and technology and cannot provide new content in the field of science and technology. Some scientific and technological achievements have filled the gap in China, but they already exist abroad, so strictly speaking, they should be uncreative.
Third, in theory. Academic papers are argumentative in form, but they are different from ordinary argumentative papers. It must have its own theoretical system, not just a list of materials. To raise perceptual knowledge to rational knowledge, we need to analyze and study a large number of facts and materials.
Generally speaking, academic papers are argumentative or argumentative. The content of the paper must conform to historical materialism and materialist dialectics, and to the scientific research methods of "seeking truth from facts", "aiming at the target" and "analyzing and synthesizing".
Academic or theoretical? Academic papers can be based on a specific product or an abstract theory. Fourth, it is easy.
It means to express scientific truth in plain language, not only literally, but also accurately, vividly, harmoniously and vividly. Topic selection is of great significance in academic paper writing.
This is because only by studying meaningful topics can we get good results and benefit the scientific cause and real life; And a meaningless research, no matter how well researched and beautifully written, has no scientific value. In the method of selecting a topic, we should pay attention to the following points: First, we should consult the literature before selecting a topic.
The purpose is to understand the research history and present situation of this discipline, and to clarify what research has been carried out in the past and what achievements have been made; Understand the research status of this subject, so as to find out what degree the research has reached at this stage and what problems have not been solved. To this end, we should go to the library to consult the newspaper catalogue index, special subject catalogue index, yearbook and other related reference books.
In addition, we need to make a file directory card. This card can be written year after year, starting with the newly published literature survey.
The way to write a card is to write down the author, book title, magazine name and page number. If it is a separate book, the publishing unit should be written, and the newspaper should write the date of issue.
Second, choose topics with academic value. The research value of the subject lies in two aspects: practical application value and scientific theory value.
It is necessary to find out whether the subject you want to study has been studied before, what is the research result, what is the conclusion, what needs to be supplemented or revised, and whether there are any remaining problems that need further study. From a large number of documents, you can see the "end point" of your research topic and find the "starting point" of the topic. Avoid "crash" and repeat other people's scientific research work, get twice the result with half the effort.