It means that when papers are published in academic journals, scientific and technological conferences and other places, anonymous review experts review the articles, and the review experts can only see the papers, but not the author's name and other information. This can ensure the fairness and professionalism of the evaluation process and avoid the influence of subjective prejudice on the evaluation results.

1. the function and significance of blind test

Blind evaluation of papers can ensure the fairness and professionalism of evaluation, make the evaluation results more objective and fair, and thus promote the development of academic research. Blind review can also effectively avoid the subjective bias of reviewers, such as the identity, background and status of the author, thus ensuring the legitimacy and fairness of the review process.

2. Advantages of blind test

Blind evaluation can ensure the objectivity and fairness of evaluation results, reduce the interference of interpersonal communication in evaluation, and avoid the influence of evaluator's subjective bias on evaluation results. In addition, blind evaluation can increase the trust of contributors in journals or conferences and improve the academic reputation of academic journals and conferences.

3. The implementation of blind trial

There are different ways of blind evaluation of papers, such as single and double blind evaluation and open blind evaluation.

Single-blind trial means that the judge doesn't know the identity of the author, while double-blind trial means that the author and the judge don't know each other's identity, while open blind trial means that the author's gender, age, nationality and other necessary basic information are disclosed to the judge without disclosing the author's information. The implementation of these methods can be selected according to different academic journals or conferences and evaluated in combination with the actual situation.

4. Defects of blind test

Although blind evaluation of papers can ensure the fairness and professionalism of the evaluation process, there are still some shortcomings, such as the reviewers' inability to obtain complete background information, which may affect the evaluation of articles; At the same time, some authors may use the blind review mechanism to avoid the quality requirements of the article itself, which increases the risk of rent-seeking behavior.

Therefore, it is necessary to further optimize the blind trial mechanism to better meet the needs of academic research.

5. How to write a blind commentary?

Understand the purpose and style of publication, and write papers in combination with your own scientific research projects; Be sure to carefully check the format and quality of the submitted papers to avoid negligence and fallacies; According to relevant teaching materials and materials, pay attention to the integrity of the internal structure of the article; The most important thing is to pay attention to the overall clarity of language expression and the coordination of all parts, so that the paper can be highly recognized by experts in the process of blind evaluation.