Reflections on teachers' corporal punishment of students 1 "Teachers are engineers of human souls", which requires teachers to have patience to help and educate every student, so as to fulfill the educational mission entrusted by education and teaching. However, year after year, examination and appraisal again and again lead education to the "battlefield" to deal with examinations-teachers teach for examinations and students study for examinations. In order to test, to make achievements, to highlight and show their achievements, teachers often require their work to be "immediate" and "talk about the chaff and see the rice". Teachers have lost a lot of patience and persuasion in educating and helping students, not to mention "small gifts, moving with emotion."
Many teachers even engage in "step by step" in teaching, and each unit passes the test; Conduct "openness" and check each lesson. In this way, teachers often forget the laws and principles that teaching should follow and that education is a step-by-step process. Especially for students with poor grades, strict "management", "card" and "pressure" are carried out in the paragraphs of graduation thesis. What is even more incomprehensible is that once teachers who do this practice make achievements, they often get immediate appreciation. It can be said that this simple way of combining examination and evaluation not only encourages teachers to be eager for success, but also makes students suffer undue and sometimes even inexplicable indecent treatment. For example, in class, it is normal for students not to answer the teacher's questions, but students will inevitably be accused or beaten by the teacher. Doesn't this phenomenon mean that teachers are eager to achieve success, and students suffer from loss?
Corporal punishment or corporal punishment in disguised form has been condemned by morality again and again, and its teachers have been punished by law again and again. However, it is forbidden for teachers to corporal punishment or corporal punishment of students in disguised form. What is the reason? Are those teachers of low moral standards? Is it because they don't understand the laws and regulations of education and teaching? Or do they lack humanity and love? No, it should be that these teachers can't face up to the differences in educational effects and correctly distinguish the relationship between students' academic performance and their own teaching work, which is a concentrated expression of eagerness for success.
1, the teacher works with a group of naive, lively, creative people. The formation of this collection is related to the age or living area of each element (that is, students), and is different from their interests, hobbies, personalities, daily behaviors and habits. An educator should go deep into such a collection, guide every student to participate in activities and complete his preset teaching task-try to make dozens of people with different interests, personalities and genders gain something after your teaching for dozens of minutes. It must be very difficult for him to do his work, and it is precisely because of this difficulty that people engaged in education and teaching are recognized by society as engineers of the human soul. It is precisely because of the complexity and difference of educational objects that words such as teaching students in accordance with their aptitude and guiding them according to the situation have become synonymous with the characteristics of teachers' work. If as educators, we don't realize this, we think that if I give students the same guidance and explanation, we will definitely get the same return from every student. With this view of ignoring students' differences, such teachers will feel that students' performance is incomprehensible when there are students who neglect their studies or are naughty in class. We can imagine what the teacher's attitude towards the students will be at this time. There is certainly no good trick, so I think the teacher's corporal punishment or disguised corporal punishment is not caused by his low moral level, but the inevitable result of the difference in educational effect because of the differences between students.
2. It is true that students' study can't be separated from teachers' careful teaching and patient guidance, and their achievements need teachers' efforts without exception. That's because the teacher is the guide for students to acquire and understand knowledge, the guide for students to apply knowledge to solve problems, and the supervisor for students to finish their studies seriously. However, teachers are not agents for students to complete their studies. No matter how important a teacher is to students, it can only be the external factor of students' learning, and the decisive factor is the students themselves. As teachers, we don't realize this, but take students' achievements as the necessity of our own teaching. As a result, we are often proud of the students who have achieved good academic results in our class, and at the same time, our attitude towards the poor students is often a kind of "hating iron and not turning into steel" or complaining repeatedly. Especially when these poor students do not perform well, teachers' tolerance, reason, love and patience are easily diluted by their excessive love for gifted students, and they often show disrespect to poor students-as teachers, we will not attribute our students' excellent achievements to ourselves, let alone take credit. You said, as a teacher, can you easily swear or fight in front of students? Therefore, correctly distinguishing the relationship between students' grades and their homework is another breakthrough for teachers to avoid corporal punishment and disguised corporal punishment.
Students' test scores are the most important weight for parents and society to evaluate teachers and to promote, adjust salaries, evaluate and assess teachers; Say something else, just to survive, don't pay attention to this achievement of students, okay? It can be seen that it is not enough for teachers to correctly distinguish the relationship between students' test scores and teachers' work. We believe that with the deepening of education and teaching reform, there will be new measures to evaluate education and teachers' work correctly and comprehensively.
Reflections on teachers' corporal punishment of students Part II Article 8 of China's Teacher Law stipulates: "Teachers shall not insult students and shall not punish students." Article 10 of China's Law on the Protection of Minors also makes corresponding provisions: "Teachers and staff in schools and kindergartens should respect the personal dignity of minors, and may not impose corporal punishment, disguised corporal punishment or other acts that insult personal dignity on underage students and children." The law is so clear, but in our school education, corporal punishment that hinders the healthy growth of students' body and mind occurs from time to time, and some cases are quite serious. Please look at a set of shots first:
[Lens 1] "You are really a lump in the wood. I can't teach it so many times. " While swearing, you pull your face, twist your arms, scratch your hair, or hit students with chalk heads, hit their heads with books, and hit their hands, feet and buttocks with wooden sticks and brooms.
[Lens 2] Poor students understand slowly, so the teacher said impatiently, "Why are you so stupid? Is your head made of granite? " Or: "You idiot!" "Go to hell!" "If I were you, I would jump off a building!" "Are you educated" or "Are you a man or a pig?" "Did you grow up eating?"
After reading the above set of shots, the author can't help but get lost in thought. Whether it is the corporal punishment that directly hurts students' bodies in "One Beat" or the corporal punishment that insults students' personality in "Two Beats", it has brought great harm and should not be underestimated. It not only harms students' health, but also affects their normal development. Moreover, it seriously dampens students' self-esteem and sense of honor and has a negative impact on students' psychology. More importantly, it has caused the estrangement and opposition between teachers and students and destroyed the normal teacher-student relationship in the school. Therefore, since 1952, the Ministry of Education issued an instruction to abolish corporal punishment of students, the national and local education administrative departments at all levels have repeatedly issued documents prohibiting teachers from corporal punishment of students. Especially since 1985, laws such as the Compulsory Education Law, the Teachers Law and the Law on the Protection of Minors have made more explicit provisions in the form of legislation: all forms of corporal punishment and corporal punishment in disguised form are prohibited. The law is so clear, why is it common for teachers to punish students? The main reasons are as follows: First, teachers are influenced by feudal residual education thoughts. Second, teachers' legal concept is weak. Third, "exam-oriented education" is widespread. The most important reason is that teachers lack good ethics. Some primary and secondary school teachers are not very passionate about their work, lack professionalism and sense of responsibility, and lack minimum love, sincerity and patience for students, especially for some underachievers (including poor students). As we all know, teaching and educating people is a glorious and arduous undertaking. If we treat it correctly and work hard, we will find endless fun and our life will be full and happy. After more than ten years of teaching practice and what I have seen and heard, I deeply feel that the way to be a teacher is to treat students as people and their own children. This is also the inherent requirement of adhering to people-oriented and building a harmonious campus. As educators, we should first educate students with love, sincerity and patience, so as to respect, trust and understand students and treat them as our own children.
First, comfort their hearts with love.
Love is a bridge between teachers and students, and it is the primary condition for teaching and educating people. Suhomlinski once said: "The concern and love of educators will leave an indelible impression on students' hearts. "So, I am always smiling and full of emotions in class; When students fail, I give them sincere comfort; Students listen carefully when they are in distress; Students can give directions in time when they are confused. People are not vegetation. In the face of the teacher's meticulous love, the students' hearts are comforted and internalized as the driving force for progress. How could they not succeed? This is how I spare no effort to pour love into them, carefully create a harmonious atmosphere in the class group, and let them feel the warmth of the group and the friendship of classmates.
Second, win their trust with sincerity.
Compared with excellent students, underachievers have stronger self-esteem. Therefore, once a mistake is made, teachers should be honest with each other and avoid public criticism, corporal punishment or corporal punishment in disguised form, otherwise it will hurt self-esteem and lose trust. For example, in my class, there was once a female student named Li, who was a headache for all teachers. She doesn't like studying and always makes trouble in class. The teacher talked to her many times, but she either denied it in every way or ignored it, and the teachers felt very helpless to her. How to educate such students? I took the method of sincere counseling and had a heart-to-heart communication with him. After many sincere heart-to-heart talks, the student gradually formed good behavior habits and improved his academic performance significantly.
Third, wait patiently for their transformation.
Educating students is a long-term and arduous task, especially the underachievers. As educators, we should learn tolerance and patience, change our psychological position, convince others, guide our actions, and let students develop in a good direction. For example, there is a boy named Wang in my class with poor academic performance and loose discipline. After a period of observation, I found that Wang played basketball well and performed well. In the school basketball match, Wang performed particularly well. I took the opportunity to greatly praise him, made him a sports committee member, gave him a chance to show his performance, and encouraged him to make all-round progress morally, intellectually and physically. After a semester of hard work, Wang's discipline has been enhanced and his academic performance has been gradually improved. Of course, the progress of students needs a process. As a teacher, we must be patient enough to evaluate students fairly and repeatedly and create favorable conditions for successful transformation.
In a word, teaching and educating people is a complicated and meticulous work, which moistens things silently. Suhomlinski once said: "The most important thing for teachers is to treat our students as living people. Therefore, in the education of these "living" students, teachers can only achieve good results if they treat each other with love, sincerity and patience, treat students as their own children, and inspire them to grow with the spirit of "all for students, all for students, all for students".
Reflections on teachers' corporal punishment of students 3 Today, I learned a case of teachers' corporal punishment of students recommended by Director Wang, and I felt a lot.
First of all, I think that although the teacher's attitude is very touching afterwards, things have happened and the damage has been formed, and no amount of regret can change the fait accompli. Therefore, impulse is the devil. As a teacher, we should really reflect deeply and strengthen our self-cultivation.
Secondly, I realized the harm of corporal punishment to students.
1, it is difficult to change students' incorrect attitudes. Although corporal punishment may achieve the purpose of stopping some behaviors, it is difficult to change students' incorrect attitudes. Corporal punishment and disguised corporal punishment can only help students learn to avoid corporal punishment, instead of sincerely changing their attitudes and correcting their mistakes.
2. It is difficult to form a good educational atmosphere. The corporal punishment of "setting an example" makes students behave cautiously, always defensive and afraid of teachers. This is not conducive to the formation of students' positive and diligent ideological quality, nor to the formation of civilized, harmonious and relaxed atmosphere in the class.
3. Corporal punishment and corporal punishment in disguised form will bring unnecessary anxiety to students. Corporal punishment can also lead to tension between teachers and students, and lead to conflicts and even confrontation between teachers and students. This not only damages the social status and personality charm of teachers, but also violates the law.
Finally, I very much agree with the view in the article that corporal punishment of students is a manifestation of teachers' poor educational methods. So, what should I do without corporal punishment?
1, the real teacher Yan is not a "penalty" teacher. A good teacher who really loves education and students will not physically punish students, but will take more effective ways to help them. Psychologists have already proved through experiments that affirmation of students is far more useful than "necessary punishment". Negative or negative reinforcement of students' mistakes is also easier for students to accept and understand than direct punishment. I remember a book saying that students are like an iron box. It's not for you to smash it with one punch, but for you to carefully find the key to their hearts. Although the situation of students is ever-changing, as long as each student feels the selfless love and deep concern of the teacher, he feels that the teacher is a trustworthy person. It is much easier to educate students by "learning from others and believing in their ways".
2. Be good at praise and clever criticism.
"The power of example is infinite." Praise and encouragement to outstanding students and teachers will also stimulate other students' interest and enthusiasm in learning from them. Of course, "no one is perfect, even the best students will inevitably have shortcomings, and even the worst students will have their own advantages." Therefore, we should seize the opportunity and the students' bright spots. As long as students make little progress, they should adopt different ways to encourage progress. Of course, it is necessary to punish students appropriately on the principle of respecting personality for those who fail to change after repeated education. Adults should be punished by public opinion and criminal law when they make mistakes, and children should be punished when they make mistakes. Let him know the consequences of making mistakes and let him know how to live correctly. But the first premise is to respect the child's personality, that is, no matter how severe the criticism is, you can't hit the child, despise the child, and you can't say anything that hurts the child's self-esteem. The second is to try to replace corporal punishment with appropriate punishment. After all, the purpose is to make him correct his mistakes, not to punish him.
3. Understand students more and use law instead of corporal punishment. Because primary and secondary school students are minors, it is inevitable that there will be behaviors beyond social rules in the process of growing up. Teachers should correctly understand these behaviors and don't get angry easily.
In short, after learning this article, I deeply realize that as a teacher, corporal punishment cannot replace the rule of law. In this sense, corporal punishment must be used to complete "education", which is the performance of educators' incompetence.