1. According to the third chapter of the Code of Scientific Ethics for Scientific and Technological Workers (Trial), which was deliberated and adopted at the third meeting of the Seventh Standing Committee of China Association for Science and Technology on June 65438+1October 65438+June 2007, academic misconduct was clearly defined, and its third article was "multiple contributions for one manuscript". Therefore, it is suggested that the other party should not contribute more than one manuscript, especially in the same field. The probability that the reviewers are the same person may be small, but the probability that CNKI's academic misconduct document detection system detects the same article is very high. Maybe it's not a big problem. Even if more than one manuscript is rejected, it can be submitted to other publications, but this kind of academic misconduct should be resolutely put an end to avoid "sequelae."

2. The way the paper is published. This form of publishing papers may not be very harmful at home, but it is very serious abroad. But if it is a foreign language article such as SCI, it may be published at home and abroad at the same time, but it is not recommended. Although China Association for Science and Technology has investigated this behavior in recent years, it should be paid more attention to, especially when evaluating the title of vice senior high school.

I am not competent enough. I hope teachers and professors can criticize and correct me. Thank you! (E-mail: we.325 100@yahoo.com.cn)