But every year, 1% of students can't even do these two simplest things well and can't grasp the best opportunity. Even the simplest things will become complicated, naturally cheated, but also doomed to be cheated. She was anxious not to be cheated. 15 years to guide the publication of papers, more than 200 students, found two basic laws:
Rule 1: Students who are introduced by acquaintances and ask for 0 in advance are in arrears and cheating after collecting all the publications. Among the more than 200 students, 4 were introduced by acquaintances, asked for 0 in advance, and all of them cheated after they were collected. LXH, FXQ and so on. A provincial water resources department. As a result, they cut off the way out for the later students in this unit. This is the second reason for rejecting DXM. Do you still want this? It's impossible.
Rule 2: Anyone who goes back on his word after entrusting, interferes if he doesn't understand, makes trouble before judging, complicates simple things and spoils good things. They are all old, stupid and poor women at the bottom. This kind of person is a loser, a scourge, and four evils: one harms himself, HLH in Zhumadian, Henan Province, and is unqualified for five years; 2. Hurt colleagues in this unit. Cut off the way for colleagues to publish authoritative publications; Three evils editor. Waste of editing. Waste editing time for half a year; The four evils are teachers. Waste the time of entrusting teachers. 、
The * * * essence of students in disastrous papers: they are all stupid and poor women at the bottom of the age, who can't grasp the key evaluation conditions and care about small things outside the evaluation conditions. The fundamental reason is the lack of high-level thinking, overall concept, ignorance of priorities, and lack of ability to recognize and employ people.
First, it's a woman. The six people who ruined the good thing were all women. No one has done it.
Second, it is the bottom women. None of the middle and senior women can do it.
Third, it is older women. No young woman does this.
Fourth, they are all poor.
Five, all idiots. Displayed as:
(1) Invert the black-and-white type. HLH made trouble before the review, and ruined the good thing in one sentence: "The name of the publication is not good, the quarterly is not as good as the monthly, and the review is invalid." Her words became "four evils". One hurt himself, and failed the examination in 20 16-202 1 5 years. How many five years are there in life? She is not poor, who is poor? She won't rot at the bottom. Who knows. (2) Hurt colleagues in the unit and cut off the way for colleagues to publish authoritative publications, especially periodicals. Three harms to the editor, wasting half a year's editing time, the editor blacklisted her and informed the periodical alliance that it would be difficult for her to publish in the future. Four harms to entrust teachers, wasting half a year. Now ask any thesis supervisor: Who can publish a thesis in a journal? You can't find many. The reason is that this journal is a standard academic journal and the most authoritative.
(2) grasp small and enlarge. After receiving the publication, WYH began to look for trouble. "Is this punctuation wrong? Which one is wrong?" After the review result is unqualified, ask "Is there any performance"? She is so stupid. She is not poor, who is poor? She won't rot at the bottom. Who knows.
(3) ............................................................................................................................................................................