Personally, I think human rights are above sovereignty, because in modern society, the only legitimate purpose of a country's existence should be to benefit its own people, rather than being reduced to a political tool for the ruling class to rule or even enslave the people. From this point of view, the fundamental significance of a country's existence is very clear-to ensure that its people's rights to survival, reproduction and development, as well as the right to live a free and happy life, are not violated, which shows that in a civilized and democratic modern country, sovereignty essentially serves human rights. What's the use of wanting a country? Does the country exist for existence? Even ruling tools? So I insist that human rights are above sovereignty.