First, * * * and prosperity are the organic unity of productive forces and relations of production. ? Rich? It shows productivity, that is, the development degree of social wealth, which is relative to poverty. ? * * * same? It shows the socialist relations of production, that is, who owns social wealth in what form, which is different from the private ownership and polarization of capitalism.

Second, * * * and wealth are not absolute egalitarianism. In the past, egalitarianism, eating the same pot, was actually * * * with backwardness and * * * with poverty, which is what we suffered. ? Therefore, when talking about wealth, we can't think that everyone should have the same amount and quality of social wealth at the same time.

Third, it takes a certain process to move towards prosperity. * * * Prosperity cannot be achieved overnight. It needs not only quantitative growth, but also qualitative breakthrough, and this process needs to go through different stages of development.