1. Apply for extension before the deadline. The published sci is basically operated by online system. If the application for delayed revision is late and the time limit set by the system is too late to be revised, the revision status of the manuscript will be automatically cleared. The author can only trace the publishing process of sci papers.
2. The reasons for applying for extension of maintenance are not sufficient.
Most papers will be revised after submission. Reprocessing means that editors systematically and comprehensively modify and supplement the manuscript according to the actual situation of the paper and referring to the opinions and specific requirements of relevant experts, so that the manuscript can meet the publishing requirements to the maximum extent. This is also a common method for journals to improve the quality of published manuscripts.
Even if the submission system is closed, the author has good reason to ask the editor to reopen the submission system in order to upload the revised manuscript. Of course, different journals may have different deadlines, and some require the revised manuscript to be returned within one month. For the second extension, the author must also grasp the time, because it is impossible to postpone it for a long time. As long as the required time is reasonable, the magazine will satisfy the author.
It is suggested that the majority of authors should revise their articles in time and arrange their time reasonably after receiving the revision suggestions of the magazine, so as not to delay the publication of the papers because of the rush of time. After receiving the revised manuscript, the author needs to study the revised content carefully. The author should take the questions raised by the editor seriously, accept the correct opinions with an open mind, and modify the text accordingly. For unacceptable opinions, the situation and reasons should be explained in the reply.
After the successful application for extension, the author must take the time to revise the paper, then read the full text carefully, check for typos and improper grammar and rhetoric, and try his best to make the revision of the paper meet the requirements of the reviewers. The author should also send back the manuscript and the revised letter and manuscript of the editorial department for the reviewers to review one by one. For the content that cannot be modified or supplemented in the text, the situation should be explained to the editorial department in written form, and it is not possible to fabricate or falsify it out of thin air.