Generally speaking, in some local examinations, you may be required to write a "strategy paper" or "countermeasure article", while in the national examination, you are usually required to write an "argumentative paper". In fact, argumentative writing itself means that the full text has a certain amount of reasoning, a certain amount of examples and a certain amount of countermeasures. According to the above, we know that strategy paper actually magnifies the amount of countermeasures, while political paper magnifies the amount of reasoning.

The national examination composition gives people the impression of attaching importance to political papers, mainly from the perspective of proposition and practical needs. Taking the composition of "don't learn etiquette, don't stand up" in the national examination of 20 16 as an example, it is obvious from this sentence that the article should focus on the necessity of "learning etiquette" If this topic is deducted, it must be an article that convinces people by reasoning.

On the other hand, the purpose of selecting public officials in the national examination is different from that in the provinces. The national examination tends to select public officials with strong theoretical ability, while the local authorities tend to select talents with strong practical ability. Therefore, because of this practical need, it determines the characteristics of the composition proposition and the articles that are valued when marking.

It is also necessary to remind everyone that candidates should master both strategic articles and reasoning articles, and then decide what kind of articles to write according to the types of their exams, especially the characteristics and requirements of the questions themselves, instead of mastering one casually and writing such articles in any exam.