Aim at the problem. Adhering to the problem orientation is a distinctive feature of Marxism. A basic prerequisite for writing a good theoretical article is to find the problem. Mao Zedong pointed out that "there is only one real theory in the world, that is, the theory extracted from objective reality and proved in objective reality" and "scientific theory is the theory abstracted from objective reality and proved in objective reality". The height of theory and the depth of practice are unified. The greatest charm of theory lies in connecting with practice, and the greatest misfortune of theory lies in its impracticality. To learn theory, we must first understand it correctly. A correct understanding of theory means a correct understanding of the relationship between theory and practice. Without theory and practice, there is no practice. The problem is the voice of the times, and the combination of theory and practice is the combination with the problem. Only by aiming the theory at the problem can we prescribe the right medicine. Only by analyzing the problems clearly and putting forward scientific countermeasures can medicine get rid of diseases. Articles divorced from problems are meaningless, and theories divorced from reality are meaningless.
The point of view is clear. A clear view is the soul of a theoretical article. If you can't clearly point out what you support and oppose, it will only be counterproductive and confuse people. That secretive, ambiguous, vacillating attitude, that indecisive, indecisive, be swayed by considerations of gain and loss attitude, that fear of criticism, just want to get praise from others attitude, is not an attitude of trying to accurately convey their views, not an attitude of writing theoretical articles, not an attitude that * * * producers should uphold. Of course, a clear view may or may not be correct. It is gratifying to have a correct view, but don't be afraid of incorrect views and vague attitudes. What's the point of writing an article if you're afraid to expose your views? People's understanding always spirals up and waves forward. In order to solve the problem, put forward your own views and show your attitude, even if it is not so correct, it can also play the role of "target", which will help everyone to discuss and study in depth and finally form a correct view. Especially when discussing work, we should advocate exploratory views instead of repeating slogans over and over again.
Thorough reasoning. Convince people by reasoning, we must explain the truth in simple terms, not scratch the boots. To explain the truth thoroughly, we can learn from the thinking method of legal person from three aspects. First, the argument is established, which is legally called "the facts are clear and the evidence is indeed sufficient". When writing an article, we should also let the data and facts talk more and let the author talk less. When there are many materials, we should extract the essence from the rough and grasp the main contradiction. The more materials, the better. One of the typical examples is that it can illustrate the problem. Second, the argument is powerful, which is called "proving the causal relationship between behavior and result" in law. In the process of argumentation, we should combine the universality and particularity of contradictions, combine qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis, and combine first-hand materials with second-hand materials. By giving examples, classifying, listing data, making comparisons, making explanations, making analogies, quoting materials and other means, the materials and viewpoints are closely linked. The third is good guidance, which is called "subjective intention" in law. The clearer the argument, the more attention is paid to guidance, which often leads readers to think about the same problem through traction logical deduction, and finally makes the conclusion come to the bottom, which coincides with the author's point of view. Rationality is not high-profile, and persuasion is the most infectious and persuasive.
Based on readers. The positioning of theoretical articles is rooted in readers, not flattering readers, but putting yourself in the reader's shoes and considering what others will think when they see your articles. Don't always think about how incisive and lofty your discourse is, only care about your own expression, regardless of the reader's feelings. For * * * producers, it is necessary to take root in the masses and take the mass line. First of all, we must have equal thinking. Without equal communication, there will be no thoughts. The bossy and condescending attitude, the attitude of claiming to be the leader every day and trying to teach others a lesson at every turn, is unacceptable. Secondly, we should use the language of the masses. The premise of being one with the masses is to learn to speak in the language of the masses. Writing an article, like giving a speech, should persuade others rationally, instead of politely refusing others to leave. Third, we should consider the interests of the masses. For party member, work is to do things for the masses, and writing articles and giving speeches is to seek things for the masses. * * * The highest state of party member's love is to love the people. As long as we think wholeheartedly about the interests of the masses, always care about the safety and warmth of the masses, and take the hearts of the people as the heart, the article will naturally be saturated with concern for the masses and will naturally be recognized by the masses.