After the interview, you should carefully sort out the interview materials in your hand and try to list those useful and valuable materials. Carefully analyze the topic of the paper, clarify the thinking of writing the paper, and determine how to use the interview materials in the paper. When writing a paper, you can use examples and use some interview materials in the paper.
When writing a thesis, you can quote some useful ideas and opinions from the interview materials. Organize the interview materials into written materials similar to the sentences and styles of the paper, and then write them directly as arguments in the paper. After concentrating the arranged interview materials, they can be used as suspense materials to arouse readers' thinking in this paper.
"If it is a big thesis (dissertation), you can add a part of" research process "in the introduction, and you can write down your interview process in this part. Of course, your interview results, such as how many cases you interviewed, what aspects of content and effect evaluation, can be written down. The specific interview content can be reflected in the discussion process as empirical materials. "
The conclusion of the interview is mainly a summary and induction of the interview materials and the results of the open questionnaire survey. We mainly use content analysis method. The specific method is to code the questionnaire first, then classify the respondents' answers, analyze the similarities and differences of different respondents' answers to the same question, and finally summarize a typical description.
By using content analysis method to summarize and analyze the results of interviews and open questionnaires, the problems existing in the process fairness of higher education are preliminarily understood, which provides theoretical and practical basis for compiling the questionnaire of process fairness of higher education. On the basis of induction and summary, we analyzed the content of each topic and drew the following conclusions:
1. Through the investigation of the interviewees' college education experience, it can be seen that compared with students from other classes, rural students are in a relatively inferior position in receiving higher education resources, which is embodied in knowledge learning, scientific research activities, social practice, awards and evaluations, helping the weak and helping the poor, interpersonal communication and so on.
Therefore, we think that students from different social classes are unfair in the process of receiving higher education. Even if you enter the same university, the resources of higher education are unequal because of different social classes. In the university environment, students from different backgrounds have not achieved the same development.
2. Through investigation, it is found that students' lack of economic capital, social capital and cultural capital in the process of receiving higher education greatly affects their fairness in receiving higher education and restricts their development in colleges and universities. These influencing factors act on the process of students' receiving higher education, and have specific manifestations in different stages and aspects. It can be seen that students' family economic status, family location and parents' education level can be introduced into this study as factors affecting the fairness of higher education process.
3. Some basic characteristics of students have certain influence on the fairness of higher education process. For example, gender affects the nature and degree of activities students participate in in the process of receiving higher education, so it has a certain impact on the quality of education they receive, but the impact of different majors is different; The influence of personality is also obvious, and introverted students are often at a disadvantage in the process of interpersonal communication.
4. The level of students' school is also one of the factors that affect the fairness of higher education process. Relatively speaking, students in high-level schools have more development opportunities and greater educational achievements.