? And then what? With what? Same? Confucius did not make the distinction first. Are Shi Bo and Yan Zi recorded in Guoyu and Zuo Zhuan right? And then what? With what? Same? It seems that Shi Bo's words are typical. He said:? Equate the sum of others with others. ? ("Mandarin? JUNG WOO ")? Him? what's up Different? Looking for the same or similar things or reasons in different ways, that is, looking for? And then what? This process. Shi Bo further elaborated the changes of the five elements and specific things, and proposed that the changes of the five elements are different from the changes of specific things. Although the changes of the five elements are the same, the formation of specific things may be different. On the contrary, the appearances of concrete things are the same, but the changes of the five elements are not necessarily the same. What about Shi Bo and Yan Zi in terms of natural objects and five elements? And then what? With what? Same? Confucius extended to? Gentleman? With what? Little people? The difference between them. Yanhe The Analects of Confucius said: Gentlemen are harmonious, but what they see is different, so they say that they are different, while villains have the same hobbies and seek their own benefits, so it is easy to get their harmony. And then what? With what? Same? Completely due to different people, gentlemen have the same view, but they don't necessarily do the same thing. For example, in education, some people think that they should be officials, others think that they should teach and educate people, etc., but they are all for education. Small people seem to be the same, that is for the benefit. If their interests are hurt by their peers, they are prone to infighting, such as birds and beasts scattered. Song Confucianism attached great importance to the debate between righteousness and benefit, and generally believed that righteousness and benefit were incompatible. It is often used by literati in the party struggle between Northern Song Dynasty and Southern Song Dynasty. Combination of Song and Confucianism? A gentleman is figurative, and a villain is figurative. , use? Yihe? Lee? Explain? Harmony but difference? , think a gentleman? And then what? what's up As a result, where are the villains? Same? what's up Lee? Driven by ... This interpretation has always influenced the late Qing Dynasty. Liu Baonan's "The Analects of Justice" says: Harmony follows righteousness and harmony benefits. ?
I explained it before, okay? Harmony but difference? From the dialectical point of view of Confucianism, it is believed that Confucianism, especially Neo-Confucianism, is dominant in static and dynamic issues, which leads to the use of? Unification? First, isn't it? Objection? First of all. ? Harmony but difference? It embodies this dialectical relationship. ? And then what? It requires seeking the same and unified attributes in the chaos. There is some truth in this understanding, but this is not what Confucius originally meant. Confucius said? Harmony but difference? It is important to reveal that gentlemen and villains have different views on things. Gentlemen seek the same content in their hearts, while villains seek the same appearance. That is to say, gentlemen and villains pursue different ideals and have different attitudes towards things. In my opinion, a gentleman should first? Who stands tall? Have lofty ideals and firm beliefs. If you stick to your ideal, your faith will never come, then? And then what? ; As for how to achieve it, we should not only keep one road, but also find another way to explore how to get twice the result with half the effort. Rusong suggested it? Debate between righteousness and benefit? Very enlightening. In Confucianism? It plays the role of guidance, restraint and continuation. Any virtue must obey the guidance of righteousness, accept the restraint of righteousness, and be infiltrated by righteousness, so that it can preserve its value for a long time and not be transformed into evil virtue. In Confucius' mind? Ren? With what? A gift? What is the specific performance? De? There are many kinds of virtues, among which righteousness plays a connecting role.
? Harmony but difference? You can also understand it this way. And then what? Is it abstract? Same? Very specific. From Shi Bo to Confucianism in Song Dynasty and Confucianism in Qing Dynasty, this issue has been discussed to varying degrees. For me, when I study Confucianism, I sometimes study history, Taoism and Buddhism. It's all about finding. And then what? In this way, on the one hand, it is reading comprehension, on the other hand, it is experiencing and pondering in practice and constantly changing one's point of view. From believing in books to not having books, that is, the process of constantly innovating, integrating the learned knowledge into one's own practical actions and making this knowledge a part of oneself, this knowledge no longer belongs to books, but to oneself, and there will be no books. Books can only provide abstract knowledge, such as history books. People and things in them can't be completely repeated. We need to get an understanding from them, which is also abstract. ? Seeking common ground while reserving differences? And then what? Harmony but difference? There is a difference. ? Seeking common ground while reserving differences? It is to find the same and similar parts, which can be deep truth or superficial, and reach a certain understanding; ? Harmony but difference? Mainly to find the same and similar parts in the depths of truth, regardless of the different ways of realization. Is it necessary to communicate with people? Seeking common ground while reserving differences? , again? Harmony but difference? You need to realize that you are different from others, and you also need to realize that others and your own * * * are essentially the same, and you can find their * * * in reason and way to promote common development.
In short, no matter what kind of truth it is, you need to understand it and make it your own understanding. Harmony but difference? No exceptions!