Compared with the small part of the application paper, the big composition writing occupies an important proportion in the score, and it is also the most difficult part in writing. In writing, candidates are not advised to quote too much from the given material, but should combine their own knowledge accumulation to make the content relevant to the topic and different. Composition writing, conception is the most important. The writing part of the composition, genre argumentation, includes three elements: argument, argument and argumentation, among which argument is the most critical, which determines whether the article is off topic or not. Only articles that stay on topic can win high marks. Other languages and rhetoric are modified and sublimated on this basis.

The argument of a paper usually consists of two parts: general argument and sub-argument. The general argument is written at the beginning of the article, which is the author's views, attitudes and opinions around the materials and topics. There is usually only one topic in an article, and the best general argument of the article is only one, that is, the author's views on the main topic, which are usually reflected in the materials. Candidates can only find this general argument by reading the materials, deeply understanding the materials, mastering the attitudes and viewpoints of the proposer, and combining with the types of questions.

The argument of the article has always been a headache for the majority of candidates. Sub-argument is an argument component used to support the general argument and also comes from materials. This is a difficult point for many candidates to learn writing. Not knowing how to determine the accurate sub-argument is also an important reason for the low score of candidates' compositions. How can we solve this problem? Next, I will focus on the methods of finding and determining sub-arguments.

First of all, determine the sub-argument through the stem of the question. The best way to find an argument is to look at the given information, analyze the given topic or topic, and judge whether there are two or four sentences to express the countermeasures and significance of the parallel or progressive relationship. This is the most direct way, but this happens less frequently.

Second, sorting out the countermeasures or points of significance of material refining. Sub-argument is to search under the general point. According to the structure of the article, the direction of argument can be discussed from two directions: analysis or countermeasures.

For example, write an argumentative essay on the topic of paying tribute to traditional culture. Then the writing direction of this article is the meaning of traditional culture; The second direction of writing is how to learn from traditional culture and focus on countermeasures.

So we just need to extract countermeasures or meanings from the materials.

Third, confirm the argument through the last two materials. For the Jilin provincial examination, the characteristics of the proposition are more prominent. Usually the arguments are placed in the last two items of the material. Candidates only need to find out two or four sentences indicating the countermeasures and meanings of the parallel or progressive relationship to support the general argument.

Four: determine the sub-arguments through the content of the previous sub-questions. Because the argument of the article basically comes from the content of the material, and the content of the previous small question often comes from the material. So we can also extract some arguments from the small content of the topic.

Only by correctly finding the total score argument can we truly meet the meaning of the topic and keep it on the topic, and the majority of candidates will have the opportunity to display their talents, reflect their cultural literacy and get high marks in the composition part.