"Concession" is a traditional virtue of the Chinese nation, and there are many stories about it in history. However, "letting" has also created the introverted character of the Chinese nation, so that it appears to be somewhat weak in foreign exchanges. Therefore, it is necessary for us to rethink the issue of "concession".

Han Xin drilled through the crotch of the street butcher and gave in to the butcher's aggressive momentum. He gave up his elegance and wisdom. "When you are four years old, you can make pears." He abandoned civilization and family. Jin Wengong's "staying out of it" has given up his integrity and spirit ... There are countless incidents of "letting" in history, but these "letting" all reflect people's courage and foresight. These should be put down.

For some things that can reflect personal excellent quality or some harmless things, you can make concessions; But if you encounter some principled problems or important things, you must do your best.

Party member, most of the producers of Hongyan, gritted his teeth under the torture of reactionaries and refused to make any concessions to the reactionaries, because it was related to the safety of the party and the success or failure of the revolution. Of course not allowed; During the Long March, Wang Ming's "Left-leaning" thought was rampant. Although Mao Zedong has no real power, he advocates and constantly criticizes this wrong line. Even if the three-man regiment of the Supreme Military Command threatened him, he would not let it go, because it was related to the safety of hundreds of Red Army soldiers and the fate of China. At the 2004 Human Rights Conference, the United States bullied others and accused China for no reason. China's Foreign Ministry did not give in, and published the 2004 American Human Rights Record to counter the slander of the United States. This concerns the reputation of the Chinese nation in the world and the international reputation and status of China. Of course not! These are all major events related to the country and the nation, and we can't let them. Once left unchecked, the consequences are unimaginable.

There is absolutely no need for us to haggle over trifles in life, so let nature take its course. This will not only make us lose nothing, but also expand my mind. Why not? However, for some important events, for some things that affect the overall situation, we must not let them!

In short, let it go, not let it go!

Comments: After the question is raised at the beginning of this article, both positive and negative arguments are launched, which is both factual and reasonable. The argument is sufficient and powerful, which not only makes readers know, but also makes readers believe. In the end, the whole article is always straightforward, concise and neat. Throughout the text, the language is a bit complicated, but it is still a masterpiece.