First, while the iron is hot, you need to be hard. In other words, we should do a good job in scientific research and write a good paper. Experienced tutors and researchers only know how to be complete, while those with poor academic level see "data" and "success". Before the experiment, they acquiesced that "the data is almost ready" and "it can be handed in next week". When you learn to comment on your papers with the eyes of reviewers (even magazine editors), your academic level will improve.
Secondly, it is very important for a paper to choose a good magazine. A good medical paper will be rejected if it is submitted to the wrong magazine. Of course, if you vote for the wrong magazine, you won't win, which is not only caused by the citation factors of the magazine.
In order to understand the scope and preferences of papers and magazines, it is necessary to spend time browsing the literature of medical papers and magazines and experience it carefully. I don't mean to change your research style by deliberately catering to the magazine style, but to choose the right magazine according to your research style and paper style.
As a reviewer and editor of this magazine, I feel at home. I know this magazine publishes such papers. What will other reviewers say if what kind of educational papers are submitted?
Third, when a paper is rejected by a magazine, don't always complain about the reviewer's discrimination and injustice against China people, find your own reasons first! If it is really unfair, how can you complain loudly and dare not confess? After finding out the reason, take the criticism as an opportunity to improve the level of your own manuscript, supplement new experiments, and carefully revise the paper before submitting it to other journals, instead of submitting it to other journals on the same day. If it is not revised, the problems mentioned by the reviewers will still exist. If you accept the change to another magazine, then the mistake is still there; If the manuscript is rejected, it is probably caused by these problems, so attitude is very important.
Fourthly, speaking of the so-called (reputation) problem, if you have kept a good job before submitting a paper, and have submitted excellent papers in scientific research and writing, and the papers you have submitted are always well received by reviewers, and can be reported in the news and widely cited after publication, and the number of citations in a short period of time far exceeds the citation factor of magazines, then the value of this paper is still great.