1000 words on the wealth of nations, writing more will help improve the writing level. We need to find the Golden House and Yan Ruyu in the book. Books fill our empty souls, and absorbing the knowledge in books can enrich our knowledge. Let's take a look at the 1000 word model essay on the wealth of nations.
Comments on The Wealth of Nations 1000 Words Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations is known as the "Bible" of western economics, which is divided into five volumes. In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith demonstrated in detail and rigorously how to increase national wealth and promote economic development and prosperity from different aspects of productivity and production relations. He adopted the macro-analysis method based on micro-economic analysis, and integrated the analysis perspectives of human nature theory, legal and political theory and economic thought theory, forming a complete economic theory system.
This book is divided into five articles. When reading the first article "On the reasons for the improvement of labor productivity and the order in which labor products are naturally distributed to people from all walks of life", we can always see the shadow of Marx's political economy. The generation and measurement of price and the relationship between value and price are one of the core theories of every economic theory. On this issue, Adam Smith thinks that labor is a measure of the exchange value of all commodities, but he does not quantify this relationship. In The Wealth of Nations, the price is like a kite, held in the hands of "labor" through a slender thread. Adam Smith also provided a reference for price-grain price. In contrast, the supply and demand theory of microeconomics "loosens" the price and turns kites into birds.
The part of this book about the change of metal currency and paper money is the most confusing part for me. I don't have a clear idea of the impact and consequences of the development of gold and silver deposits, such as the influx of money into the market, the contradiction between the exchange ratio of gold and silver and the actual value, and the issuance of paper money. I just vaguely feel that the development and evolution of money is a kind of "centrifugal movement" of price and value, and it is getting farther and farther. The price of convenience and quickness is fluctuating and variable. More and more, it is a kind of "trust" and "* * * knowledge" that links goods with money, value and price, which violates the authority of the state and the long-standing rules of the game. This kind of "trust" and "* * * knowledge" has the color of a national game, and it is not known whether it is true or not. Just like a game that only knows the beginning and the end, the process is hidden in a black box, and I don't know where the boundary between "controllable" and "out of control" is.
Adam Smith believes that the division of labor is an important factor in national economic growth. In the era of large-scale machine production, standardized division of labor and production line operation have greatly improved labor productivity and greatly promoted economic development. For the current economy, the division of labor is more obvious. Adam Smith was able to discover this secret at that special time, which shows his super insight!
Adam Smith rigorously and accurately demonstrated national wealth from two aspects: productivity and relations of production. Here, he emphasized the import and export trade of a country. A country's import and export trade is an important source of national tax revenue and the top priority of a country's wealth. Combined with China, this view can be fully proved. In 20 10, China's net export trade was nearly 3 trillion, accounting for 10% of the world. Foreign exchange reserves have reached $2,847.338 billion. Today, China's foreign exchange reserves have surpassed Japan to become the world's number one. Strong import and export trade has not only increased national wealth, but also increased China's right to speak in international affairs.
Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations has a great influence on the global economy. 1776 The birth of Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations can be said to have cleared the way for the development of British capitalist economy! Perhaps, when a country is in transition, it needs a strong support, and Adam Smith's free economic system is such a powerful force that he has been recognized by the bourgeoisie. Britain is at the forefront of great changes in the world. The free economic system has not only brought great changes to Britain, but also promoted the great economic prosperity of an era! As a result, an economic system dominated by market economy has been formed. Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations shows us the author's profound thinking and great contribution to the world economy. What I want to say is that you don't know socialism without reading Das Kapital. Similarly, you don't know what a market economy is without reading The Wealth of Nations.
Comment on The Wealth of Nations 1000 2 Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations is the year when The Wealth of Nations was first published 1776 and the year when the American Declaration of Independence was published. In the development of capitalist society, The Wealth of Nations has played an important role in promoting it. Max, editor of The Wealth of Nations? Lerner commented: "This book is a strange combination of economics, philosophy, history, political theory and practical planning. This is a book written by a man with profound knowledge and insight. This person is very analytical and can filter out all the information in his notebook. Smith was very sensitive to various viewpoints in the academic field at that time, because he had strong comprehensive ability and the ability to recombine these viewpoints in new and striking ways. Like Marx later, he was not an isolated scholar confined to his own home. He seems to be equipped with an antenna all over his body, which can receive and absorb all possible information. At the end of the disintegration of feudal Europe and the beginning of the modern world, he wrote that in the modern world, the feudal system still adheres to the stubbornness that vested interest groups often show. He wrote against such interest groups. So his books are not only written for library shelves, but also have a far-reaching impact on economic views and national policies. It constitutes the entire living environment in which we live today. "
The last question to be answered by Smith in The Wealth of Nations is how the internal struggle between emotion and "just bystander" happened on the historical stage in the long-term evolution of society. The fifth part gives the answer to this question. He listed four main organizational stages of social development, which will continue unless they are stopped due to lack of resources, war or bad government policies. These four stages are: the first "savage" stage of hunters, the second stage of primitive agriculture, the third stage of feudal or manor farming, and the fourth stage of commercial interdependence. Each stage is accompanied by a system that adapts to its needs. For example, in the hunter stage, "there is no property ... therefore, there is no established chief executive or formal judicial administration." With the emergence of cattle and sheep, more complex forms of social organization have emerged, including not only the "terrible" army, but also the indispensable fortress of public security. The core of Smith's thought is that this system is a tool to protect privileges and cannot be protected by natural law. He said, "the establishment of a civilian government is for the safety of property. In fact, it was established to protect the rich from the poor, that is, to protect those who have some property from those who have no property at all. " Finally, Smith described this evolution as a social stage, from feudalism to the need for a new system, which was decided by the market rather than trade associations and was free from government restrictions. This was later called laissez-faire capitalism and Smith called it a completely free system. This constant change in the material production base will inevitably bring about changes in the superstructure, which is obviously similar to the Marxist view of history. But there is also a major difference: the last driving force in the Marxist system is class struggle, while in the history of Smith's philosophy, the main driving mechanism is "humanity", which is driven by the desire for self-improvement and guided by reason.
The Wealth of Nations is far from being a widely recognized academic paper. Although Smith also persuaded laissez-faire, his argument was even more opposed to government intervention and monopoly. Although he praised the result of greed, he almost always despised the behavior and strategy of businessmen. Nor does he think that the business system itself is entirely commendable.
Comments on The Wealth of Nations 1000 3 The Wealth of Nations is divided into five chapters, covering the principles of political economy, economic history, economic theory history and finance. It can be said that it is not only an encyclopedia of economics, but also a foundation work of economics. Although it has a huge system and a wide range of contents, it is consistent and tightly structured from beginning to end. A theme that the book always revolves around is how to promote the growth of national wealth.
What is the source of wealth? Smith said in the preface: "The annual labor of citizens of a country is the source of all necessities and conveniences they consume every year." Since "labor is the father of wealth", to increase wealth, we must improve labor efficiency or increase the number of workers.
In The Wealth of Nations, Adam and Smith elaborated on the importance of division of labor. It plays an important role in improving production efficiency, timeliness of management or innovation of production equipment.
Smith believes that exchange is an innate tendency of human beings. If you want to take it, you must give it first. There is a division of labor because of exchange. So, how to determine the exchange value of goods? Smith clearly pointed out: "Labor is the real measure of all exchange values." This means that the value of goods depends on labor. But Smith also claimed that this theory only adapted to the barbaric era of human society. Once capital is accumulated and invested in enterprises or land is privately owned, the situation is another matter. Because at this time, all the products of labor are no longer owned by workers, and some of them are collected by employers and landlords as profits and land rent.
From this, Smith came to another conclusion: after capital accumulation and land privatization, it is not only labor, but also profits and land rent that determine the value of goods. In this way, wages, profits and land rent are not only the source of all income, but also the "three fundamental sources of all exchange value."
In this way, Smith unconsciously changed from labor theory of value to the theory that three kinds of income determine value. Marx's theory that three kinds of income determine value is called "Smith dogma", and many later theories of western economics, such as production cost theory and abstinence theory, can find their ideological source. Smith did contribute to the mystery of commodity value, but on the other hand, he was vague and indecisive on the value issue, leaving many ambiguous answers for future generations. Later economists took their own needs, and Smith adopted the explanation according to their tastes. Even those schools that are deadlocked can find traces of this distribution from Smith at the same time.
The Wealth of Nations is the cornerstone of economics. But this idea goes far beyond the scope of economics. A description of the history of human development can also be found in it. Because the convenience of waterway transportation is better than that of land transportation, waterway has a huge network structure, which can transport the produced products to distant places for exchange. At the same time, waterways are naturally produced and have existed for thousands of years with the appearance of human beings. Its unreliability determines that human beings can only coexist with rivers, and the transformation of rivers is also the result of the development of modern science and technology. The exchange advantage of rivers promotes the occurrence of economic behavior. This has promoted the prosperity of the region and enriched people's lives. This has attracted more people to move in and join the economic production. In this cycle, the scale of the city appears. Also gave birth to human civilization.